MarioWiki talk:Mushroom World Encyclopedia: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Inactivity) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I think "mariowiki.net" should be marked as (inactive) because of it's inactivity, and small amount of Inactivity. It could be useful for users who click on it. [[Special:Contributions/46.85.79.44|46.85.79.44]] 12:36, 6 December 2017 (EST) | I think "mariowiki.net" should be marked as (inactive) because of it's inactivity, and small amount of Inactivity. It could be useful for users who click on it. [[Special:Contributions/46.85.79.44|46.85.79.44]] 12:36, 6 December 2017 (EST) | ||
:Doesn't matter if a site is inactive or not as long as it is still up and has the info we're looking for. As a wiki, it could become active at any moment, so it would probably be pointless to mark it. For example, we don't mark WarsWiki for being inactive despite it being locked. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 12:38, 6 December 2017 (EST) | :Doesn't matter if a site is inactive or not as long as it is still up and has the info we're looking for. As a wiki, it could become active at any moment, so it would probably be pointless to mark it. For example, we don't mark WarsWiki for being inactive despite it being locked. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 12:38, 6 December 2017 (EST) | ||
::(There is a problem with talking here. This is my second try.) I contacted the one editor "MeincraftManu" which is an admin of it, which seems unresponsible, because he is not answering on the forum, they marked on the wiki. There is an window who tells you how long he took to read (Amount of time: 8 minutes). Also, the other Wiki I've found, of the wikia site, has a lot more sites, better edits, while this wiki tho has wrong informations, crappy edits, and Templates that are broke making the user to feel not to read it. [[Special:Contributions/46.85.79.44|46.85.79.44]] 12:46, 6 December 2017 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 13:47, December 6, 2017
Inactivity
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
I think "mariowiki.net" should be marked as (inactive) because of it's inactivity, and small amount of Inactivity. It could be useful for users who click on it. 46.85.79.44 12:36, 6 December 2017 (EST)
- Doesn't matter if a site is inactive or not as long as it is still up and has the info we're looking for. As a wiki, it could become active at any moment, so it would probably be pointless to mark it. For example, we don't mark WarsWiki for being inactive despite it being locked.
12:38, 6 December 2017 (EST)
- (There is a problem with talking here. This is my second try.) I contacted the one editor "MeincraftManu" which is an admin of it, which seems unresponsible, because he is not answering on the forum, they marked on the wiki. There is an window who tells you how long he took to read (Amount of time: 8 minutes). Also, the other Wiki I've found, of the wikia site, has a lot more sites, better edits, while this wiki tho has wrong informations, crappy edits, and Templates that are broke making the user to feel not to read it. 46.85.79.44 12:46, 6 December 2017 (EST)
