MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario Kart 7: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Keep featured article status: Very well, I'll retract my vote until I finish) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per Time Turner. | #{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per Time Turner. | ||
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per Time Turner. | #{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per Time Turner. | ||
#{{User|LuigiMaster123}} Per Time Turner. | |||
==== Keep featured article status ==== | ==== Keep featured article status ==== | ||
Revision as of 19:49, October 2, 2017
Mario Kart 7
Remove featured article status
- Time Turner (talk) The intro is suprisingly bereft of information despite being so wordy (it's a part of the Mario Kart series and it has new stuff, but what is this game?), the gameplay doesn't once talk about the game's standard gameplay beyond the new stuff, every non-racer is bunched together into an unhelpfully undetailed section, the Pre-release and unused content is an empty section, and the Staff really seems like it could be expanded with more context. Also, several of the references are broken, enough that it's cause for concern.
- Baby Luigi (talk) Per Time Turner.
- TheFlameChomp (talk) Per Time Turner.
- LuigiMaster123 (talk) Per Time Turner.
Keep featured article status
Removal of support/oppose votes
Tails777
- Time Turner (talk) "currently being worked on" is definitely not the same as "is in working condition now", and until everything about the article is actually worthy of being featured, there's no reason for it to remained featured. Let's not be hasty.
Comments
I have started by adding a section for standard gameplay and features and giving the Pre-Released content header a section of info. I plan to go about removing broken references and there in lies my question: is it fine to just removed them since the game has been out for 6 years now or do we still need references for some of these points? 
Tails777 Talk to me!
