MarioWiki:Proposals: Difference between revisions
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
==== Move to Parakoopa ==== | ==== Move to Parakoopa ==== | ||
#{{User:Max2/sig}} Last time I remember, they were called Parakoopa in about... 5 games. Besides, it's more well known. | |||
==== Leave at Koopa Paratroopa ==== | ==== Leave at Koopa Paratroopa ==== |
Revision as of 08:22, August 10, 2007
A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed with the signature code ~~~(~). How To
The times are in EDT, and are set so that the user is more likely to be online at those times (after school, weekend nights). So for example, if a proposal is added on Saturday night at 11:59 PM EDT, the deadline is the next Saturday night at 8:00 PM. If it is indeed a minute later, the deadline is a day plus 15 hours (Sunday), as opposed to a day minus 4 hours. New FeaturesNone currently RemovalsNone currently ChangesMoving Koopa ParatroopaThe flying Koopas are currently under the article name of "Koopa Paratroopa", their official name from Super Mario Bros. However, I believe that we should use a name from more recent games, such as Paratroopa or Parakoopa as the article name. Proposer: Cobold (talk · contribs) 09:16, 10 August 2007 (EDT) Move to ParatroopaMove to Parakoopa
Leave at Koopa ParatroopaCommentsSplitsOne of the most common proposals, related to splitting one article into multiple ones. MergesOne of the most common proposals, related to combining articles into one. Merge Minor Articles in Category:Implied into One List PageMost of the implied article are just too stubish and can't really be improved.And really, making an article on an organization that was briefly mentioned in some game just look silly. I thought we could merge all those article into one big page. Of course, some such as Pixl Queen, Waffle Kingdom and Scarlette could remain as article because of the importance thgey have in their respective game. Only Minor one (Such as Old Man Skoo.) should be merged. Proposer: Gofer 17:38, 4 August 2007 (EDT) Support MergeOppose Merge
CommentsThis is a bad idea, one that page would be super long that no-one could edit it w/o major lag, 2. Most pages do have enough info, but some could use work. XzelionETC Eerrrrpphh... After reading some articles, I saw most of them are well written and ahvwe a good size, Can I withdraw this? Scorponok As far as I know, the proposer holds the responsibility for the proposal, so I think you can. If not, your edit can always be undone, so it won't be a problem! Stumpers! MiscellaneousNone currently |