Template talk:Tem: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
Should this template have <nowiki><code></code></nowiki> surrounding its transcluded parts? --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 00:40, 26 October 2016 (EDT)
Should this template have <nowiki><code></code></nowiki> surrounding its transcluded parts? --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 00:40, 26 October 2016 (EDT)
:It wouldn't be necessary. The whole reason of this template is to make it look like the proper coding like this {{[[Template:Mariogames|Mariogames]]}}. So I don't see why it would be necessary. {{User:The RPG Gamer/sig}} 00:52, 26 October 2016 (EDT)
:It wouldn't be necessary. The whole reason of this template is to make it look like the proper coding like this {{[[Template:Mariogames|Mariogames]]}}. So I don't see why it would be necessary. {{User:The RPG Gamer/sig}} 00:52, 26 October 2016 (EDT)
::[[Bulbapedia:Template:Template|Bulbapedia]] does it. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 02:20, 26 October 2016 (EDT)

Revision as of 01:20, October 26, 2016

Surrounded with Code Tags

Block Super Mario World.png This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

Should this template have <code></code> surrounding its transcluded parts? --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 00:40, 26 October 2016 (EDT)

It wouldn't be necessary. The whole reason of this template is to make it look like the proper coding like this {{Mariogames}}. So I don't see why it would be necessary. The RPG Gamer (talk) (edits) Love Pit.png 00:52, 26 October 2016 (EDT)
Bulbapedia does it. --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 02:20, 26 October 2016 (EDT)