Talk:Fawfulized: Difference between revisions
RubberLuigi (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:::::::Why not put all the fawfulized enemies in the Beanish category, I look to the "Shroobified" article since it's somewhat similar to the Fawfulized thing, there is a Shroob category and they are some shroobified enemy that appear on this category. The reason the fawfulized enemies could go in the Beanish category is because Fawful is a beanish and the fawfulized enemies look like Fawful. Like how the shroobified enemies appear on the Shroob category.--{{User:LudwigVon/sig}} 19:36, 29 January 2016 (EST) | :::::::Why not put all the fawfulized enemies in the Beanish category, I look to the "Shroobified" article since it's somewhat similar to the Fawfulized thing, there is a Shroob category and they are some shroobified enemy that appear on this category. The reason the fawfulized enemies could go in the Beanish category is because Fawful is a beanish and the fawfulized enemies look like Fawful. Like how the shroobified enemies appear on the Shroob category.--{{User:LudwigVon/sig}} 19:36, 29 January 2016 (EST) | ||
::::::::I'm going to chime in and say I think it's doomed. The page title is misleading, as well; this page is more of a list of Fawfulized enemies, whereas the title implies that it's about Fawfulization. But that's just my opinion. {{User:Roy Koopa/sig}} 20:46, 29 January 2016 (EST) | ::::::::I'm going to chime in and say I think it's doomed. The page title is misleading, as well; this page is more of a list of Fawfulized enemies, whereas the title implies that it's about Fawfulization. But that's just my opinion. {{User:Roy Koopa/sig}} 20:46, 29 January 2016 (EST) | ||
:::::::::They're not really Beanish things, tho? Most of them are robots, and the organic things don't have any sprout or Beanish accents, just Fawful grins and glasses. Seems like too much extrapolation. Keep in mind that unlike this situation, the Shroobified things were all in the same game, too. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 00:37, 30 January 2016 (EST) |
Revision as of 00:37, January 30, 2016
Are Bowser's minions Fawfulized too or are they just brainwashed.
— The preceding unsigned comment was added by 155.143.16.99 (talk).
Are Bowser's minions fawfulized or is Fawfulized just Fawful-Created stuff like the Sea Pipe Statue Magifoofa etc.
— The preceding unsigned comment was added by 155.143.16.99 (talk).
- If I remember correctly (it's been a while since I played BIS) it's regular things brainwashed into following Fawful. J-Luigi (talk) 17:35, 30 November 2015 (EST)
Delete?
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
It was pointed out to me (on another website) that this page is just a list of Fawful-related things, from things he built to things he may have brainwashed or merely tampered with. The latter category includes things (Sea Pipe Statue, Peach's Castle) that don't have any of the trademark Fawful features, and seem ill-placed here, but really, the entire page seems unnecessary. There's no real reason to take "Fawfulization" as a literal process - Fawful makes up words all the time as he chatters away. At least for Shroobified, the game explicitly showed things turning into Shroob Mushrooms, but even then, I'm dubious about that list too. But this page, for sure, just seems unnecessary. - Walkazo 23:20, 27 January 2016 (EST)
- One question: does Fawful use this term frequently, like declaring it whenever this "Fawfulization" happens? Mario-HOHO! (Talk / Stalk) 23:43, 27 January 2016 (EST)
- Nope, it only happens twice in the whole game - there's the page's "Fawfulization" quote (about Peach's Castle), and he calls the Sea Pipe Statue "Fawfulized". So actually, the two odd ones out in the list are the only things officially associated with the term: all the Fawfully enemies are never described as such (nor as "Fawfully", to be clear - that's only used once about a chortling keychain, and once in a song). - Walkazo 00:12, 28 January 2016 (EST)
- Yeah, the situation looks pretty bleak for this page. I say we bomb it. Mario-HOHO! (Talk / Stalk) 16:07, 28 January 2016 (EST)
- If no one argues about it by tomorrow, I'll delete it. No need for a TPP to drag it out for 2 weeks unless someone makes a fuss. - Walkazo 17:49, 28 January 2016 (EST)
- Would it make more sense to merge Fawfulized with Fawful? --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 22:53, 28 January 2016 (EST)
- Like, a "list of things that resemble Fawful in BIS" section? Seems unnecessary. Just skim the enemy list in the template any everything that sounds like him looks like him. I'd suggest making a category, but again, hard to think of a non-crappy name that sounds justifiable since "Fawfulized" itself doesn't seem to apply to the Fawful-ish enemies. - Walkazo 19:21, 29 January 2016 (EST)
- Why not put all the fawfulized enemies in the Beanish category, I look to the "Shroobified" article since it's somewhat similar to the Fawfulized thing, there is a Shroob category and they are some shroobified enemy that appear on this category. The reason the fawfulized enemies could go in the Beanish category is because Fawful is a beanish and the fawfulized enemies look like Fawful. Like how the shroobified enemies appear on the Shroob category.--(TALK) 19:36, 29 January 2016 (EST)
- I'm going to chime in and say I think it's doomed. The page title is misleading, as well; this page is more of a list of Fawfulized enemies, whereas the title implies that it's about Fawfulization. But that's just my opinion. J-Luigi (talk) 20:46, 29 January 2016 (EST)
- They're not really Beanish things, tho? Most of them are robots, and the organic things don't have any sprout or Beanish accents, just Fawful grins and glasses. Seems like too much extrapolation. Keep in mind that unlike this situation, the Shroobified things were all in the same game, too. - Walkazo 00:37, 30 January 2016 (EST)
- I'm going to chime in and say I think it's doomed. The page title is misleading, as well; this page is more of a list of Fawfulized enemies, whereas the title implies that it's about Fawfulization. But that's just my opinion. J-Luigi (talk) 20:46, 29 January 2016 (EST)
- Why not put all the fawfulized enemies in the Beanish category, I look to the "Shroobified" article since it's somewhat similar to the Fawfulized thing, there is a Shroob category and they are some shroobified enemy that appear on this category. The reason the fawfulized enemies could go in the Beanish category is because Fawful is a beanish and the fawfulized enemies look like Fawful. Like how the shroobified enemies appear on the Shroob category.--(TALK) 19:36, 29 January 2016 (EST)
- Like, a "list of things that resemble Fawful in BIS" section? Seems unnecessary. Just skim the enemy list in the template any everything that sounds like him looks like him. I'd suggest making a category, but again, hard to think of a non-crappy name that sounds justifiable since "Fawfulized" itself doesn't seem to apply to the Fawful-ish enemies. - Walkazo 19:21, 29 January 2016 (EST)
- Would it make more sense to merge Fawfulized with Fawful? --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 22:53, 28 January 2016 (EST)
- If no one argues about it by tomorrow, I'll delete it. No need for a TPP to drag it out for 2 weeks unless someone makes a fuss. - Walkazo 17:49, 28 January 2016 (EST)
- Yeah, the situation looks pretty bleak for this page. I say we bomb it. Mario-HOHO! (Talk / Stalk) 16:07, 28 January 2016 (EST)
- Nope, it only happens twice in the whole game - there's the page's "Fawfulization" quote (about Peach's Castle), and he calls the Sea Pipe Statue "Fawfulized". So actually, the two odd ones out in the list are the only things officially associated with the term: all the Fawfully enemies are never described as such (nor as "Fawfully", to be clear - that's only used once about a chortling keychain, and once in a song). - Walkazo 00:12, 28 January 2016 (EST)