Category talk:Blocked users: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
I'm considering deleting this, due in no small part to the fact that we never use the tag/template.{{User:HK-47/sig}} | I'm considering deleting this, due in no small part to the fact that we never use the tag/template.{{User:HK-47/sig}} | ||
The block template places the account in question on this list, however, it isn't being used (the template nor this list). That said, we currently only have two people that this applies to and that will change in due time. I will give this matter some time, but I think a delete would be best. -- [[Image:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 03:00, 7 June 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 02:00, June 7, 2007
Is this category ever used? If not we should start using it. Anybody willing to take care of it?Knife (talk) 20:05, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
Should this category include users who where blocked in the past but are not currently? User:Gofer
Currently blocked users, I guess.Knife (talk) 20:28, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
Only sysops can tag them.--
Aipom 
--
- Currently blocked users go in this category. This does not apply to trolls/users blocked indefinitely. Only for temporary blocks. Phoenix Rider
Yes, it can, but there's really no point, since they most likely won't come back. Phoenix Rider 16:53, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
I'm considering deleting this, due in no small part to the fact that we never use the tag/template.SaudyTalk!
The block template places the account in question on this list, however, it isn't being used (the template nor this list). That said, we currently only have two people that this applies to and that will change in due time. I will give this matter some time, but I think a delete would be best. -- 
Chris 03:00, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
