MarioWiki:Featured articles/N4/Princess Peach: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Toa 95 moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N4/Princess Peach to MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N/Princess Peach without leaving a redirect: The numbers are only added after the "N" when archiving.) |
Smash Bros (talk | contribs) m (→Support) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Ashley and Red}}OK. This article is full of info, and I reviewed jt by myself, it covers all her appearances. The article is well written, '''all''' in present tense, plus, have a good amount of images. The relationships article looks well divided, in this way. Her "Etimology/Name" section covers al the necerssaly info, and I can't find speculation anywhere. The article growed up since the last nomination (made by me, and the unfeature ine by me too). I also want to.give special attention to the best sections, The Paper Mario and the Mario & Luigi ones, that are very well detailed. I also added more "Other Appearances" that were lacking, and made minor edits hete and there. Oh, by the way, the Mario Party and the Mario Kart sections look trimmed enough, and detailed at the same time. | #{{User|Ashley and Red}}OK. This article is full of info, and I reviewed jt by myself, it covers all her appearances. The article is well written, '''all''' in present tense, plus, have a good amount of images. The relationships article looks well divided, in this way. Her "Etimology/Name" section covers al the necerssaly info, and I can't find speculation anywhere. The article growed up since the last nomination (made by me, and the unfeature ine by me too). I also want to.give special attention to the best sections, The Paper Mario and the Mario & Luigi ones, that are very well detailed. I also added more "Other Appearances" that were lacking, and made minor edits hete and there. Oh, by the way, the Mario Party and the Mario Kart sections look trimmed enough, and detailed at the same time. | ||
#Why not? Really, why not? [[User:Smash Bros|Smash Bros]] ([[User talk:Smash Bros|talk]]) 12:06, 25 November 2014 (EST) | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== |
Revision as of 12:06, November 25, 2014
Princess Peach
Support
- Ashley and Red (talk)OK. This article is full of info, and I reviewed jt by myself, it covers all her appearances. The article is well written, all in present tense, plus, have a good amount of images. The relationships article looks well divided, in this way. Her "Etimology/Name" section covers al the necerssaly info, and I can't find speculation anywhere. The article growed up since the last nomination (made by me, and the unfeature ine by me too). I also want to.give special attention to the best sections, The Paper Mario and the Mario & Luigi ones, that are very well detailed. I also added more "Other Appearances" that were lacking, and made minor edits hete and there. Oh, by the way, the Mario Party and the Mario Kart sections look trimmed enough, and detailed at the same time.
- Why not? Really, why not? Smash Bros (talk) 12:06, 25 November 2014 (EST)