Talk:Demon

Shouldn't be a Redirect

The Shadow Queen article links to this as though demon were a species. Since we both have that demon and the one who appeared in Brawl, shouldn't we consider making an article about the topic? There are probably even more demons that I just don't know about. Stumpers! 20:31, 15 February 2009 (EST)

I agree. You could also mention Black Chest Demons. — Stooben Rooben 20:43, 15 February 2009 (EST)

I changed it to a regular article. Yoshario (talk)

Is demon even notable enough, as it is just a general term used to describe certain characters? Should we have an article for Fish or Magicians? Seems better as a category. The concept just really isn't well established. -- Son of Suns (talk) P.S. Or this page could serve as a disambig for different subjects referred to as "demon."

I agree with your second idea of a disambig, SoS. -- Shiancoe 21:18, 15 February 2009 (EST)

Red is also a demon. Stumpers! 23:20, 15 February 2009 (EST)

Delete Demon.

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Friday, January 3, 2025, 01:46 GMT

Is this really necessary? There's a category.

Proposer: Joseph (talk)
Deadline: September 19, 2014, 23:59 GMT

Delete

1. Joseph (talk) Per what I said above.

Keep

1. Randombob-omb4761 (talk) So what? We have a category for Dogs and yet it has a page.
2. Vommack (talk) Having a disambig and a category with same/similar names isn't the same thing. They have two seperate functions, and having one doesn't prevent from having the other. That said, most of the things on here are demons, but aren't named demon. That's the function of a category. There are a few that do have demon in the name, so keep those. Tl;dr: Trim entries, but don't delete.

Comments

@Randombob-omb4761 that's because it's not a disambiguation. Joseph (talk) (contribs)

That still doesn't prove anything, a disambiguation is a type of page. ~~ Boo4761