Talk:Flame Chomp: Difference between revisions
m (Yoshi876 moved page Talk:Fire Chomp to Talk:Flame Chomp: TPP passed) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
SuperYoshiBros: Good point. It might be the case, although I really doupt it. Good argument anyway. {{User|Zuper Zaloster}} 14:19, 12 August 2013 (EDT) | SuperYoshiBros: Good point. It might be the case, although I really doupt it. Good argument anyway. {{User|Zuper Zaloster}} 14:19, 12 August 2013 (EDT) | ||
:BTW, another reason why I think the Flame Chomp is a sub-species is that 2D Mario enemies that act differently often is another enemy type (even if they look the same). {{User|Zuper Zaloster}} 23:06, 12 August 2013 (EDT) | :BTW, another reason why I think the Flame Chomp is a sub-species is that 2D Mario enemies that act differently often is another enemy type (even if they look the same). {{User|Zuper Zaloster}} 23:06, 12 August 2013 (EDT) | ||
==3D enemy?== | |||
I think the Fire chomps (or Flame chomps) would make a cool enemy in a 3D Mario game. What do you guys think. | |||
Revision as of 07:20, September 7, 2013
Could we get a clearer New Super Mario Bros. pic? Kobble 19:06, 19 July 2008 (EDT)
I think we need a sprite of Super Mario Bros. 3 NES Fire Chomp. Do the Koopa!
Move to Flame Chomp
Template:SettledTPP ACCEPTED 10-1
In New Super Luigi U, a mainstream game, they are called Flame Chomps instead of Fire Chomp. I think we should move it.
Proposer: SuperYoshiBros (talk)
Deadline: August 12, 2013, 23:59 GMT
Support
- SuperYoshiBros (talk) Per Proposal.
- Super Elite Army Hammer Bro (talk) Per SuperYoshiBros.
- Gonzales Kart Inc. (talk) If it's called a flame chomp in the game, it should be called that in the article.
- Megadardery (talk) It is already in MarioWiki:Naming "If a subject's name has changed over time, the more commonly used modern name should be used as the title, rather than the historic name. For example, Princess Peach's original English name was "Princess Toadstool", however, she is usually called "Princess Peach" in recent games, so the article's title is "Princess Peach"."
- Iggy Koopa Jr (talk)Per Proposal.
- Yoshi876 (talk) Per Megadardey.
- ParaLemmy1234 (talk) Per all.
- MegaKoopa (talk) Per all.
- Madikoopa (talk) Per all.
- Goombob (talk) Per all.
Oppose
- Zuper Zaloster (talk) Hold on, guys. Maybe the Flame chomp is a sub-species of the Fire chomp (the main reason behind my thoughts is that they act differently than the normal fire chomps by spitting a large fireball instead of several normal ones).
Comments
Zuper Zaloster: It could be an acquired ability, since the enemy looks the same. 
Mario-HOHO! (Talk / Stalk) 23:13, 10 August 2013 (EDT)
- Exactly. It's like how Goombas in Super Mario Bros. and Paper Mario are considered the same thing, even though one just walks and the other headbonks. --
Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 13:46, 11 August 2013 (EDT)
SuperYoshiBros: Good point. It might be the case, although I really doupt it. Good argument anyway. Zuper Zaloster (talk) 14:19, 12 August 2013 (EDT)
- BTW, another reason why I think the Flame Chomp is a sub-species is that 2D Mario enemies that act differently often is another enemy type (even if they look the same). Zuper Zaloster (talk) 23:06, 12 August 2013 (EDT)
3D enemy?
I think the Fire chomps (or Flame chomps) would make a cool enemy in a 3D Mario game. What do you guys think.
