Talk:Hotel Mario: Difference between revisions
(→SMB2 reference: new section) |
(→SMB2 reference: new section) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
::::Yes, also i must agree {{user|Castle Toad}} | ::::Yes, also i must agree {{user|Castle Toad}} | ||
== SMB2 reference | ==[[SMB2]] reference== | ||
On the cover, does mario appear as he does in SMB2 on the cover? (Position) Goombob [[File:NewMicroGoomba.png]] 15:43, 11 July 2013 (EDT) | |||
On the cover, | |||
Revision as of 14:43, July 11, 2013
Poor voice acting and bizarre format?
Is that not an opinion? MamaWaluigi 16:29, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
Critic opinion.Knife (talk) 16:35, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
Well ,it is. But it's the general consencus. Gofer
- Not really. Why, then, is it used in Youtube Poop, then? MamaWaluigi 13:58, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
I'm pretty sure that's exactly why it's used in YouTube Poop.
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hammerthingys42 (talk).
Regardless, critic opinions should be properly referenced with reference tags. Stumpers! 18:24, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
Wikipedia?
This article looks exactly like the one on Wikipedia. 
Luigifan123
Oh, thanks for telling me. Luigifan123
Credits
Are the credits really necessary?
Ralphfan>>Waste of space, in my opinion.
Sorry to bring up this tired debate but...
Mark Graue acknowledge the existence of Youtube Poops, albeit indirectly:
"I think it’s very cool ( and flattering ) that something that was recorded in 1993 has found new life on [YouTube videos that are using Mario & Luigi’s voice for their comedic video collages]."
So yeah, thoughts?--Blitzwing 18:07, 20 April 2009 (EDT)
- This is very interesting. Not only should Marc have his own aticle me thinks, but maybe a reference of Youtube Poops somewhere in the wiki would be nice. Anyone agree?
Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)·
- Yes, also i must agree Castle Toad (talk)
SMB2 reference
On the cover, does mario appear as he does in SMB2 on the cover? (Position) Goombob 
15:43, 11 July 2013 (EDT)
