Template talk:SMB3 levels: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Oppose) |
Freakworld (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
===Support=== | ===Support=== | ||
#{{User|Goomba}} Per proposal. | #{{User|Goomba}} Per proposal. | ||
#{{User|BowserJunior}} Per Freakworld. | #{{User|BowserJunior}} Per Freakworld. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
I have removed my oppose, because the template really is unnecessary (see above). -{{User|Freakworld}} | I have removed my oppose, because the template really is unnecessary (see above). -{{User|Freakworld}} | ||
@YoshiKong Sorry, I didn't know that policy existed. I guess I will just leave this topic untouched as I don't want to violate anything. -{{User|Freakworld}} | |||
Revision as of 08:17, May 14, 2013
Delete this template
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Wednesday, November 27, 2024, 20:28 GMT
I honestly think that this template should be deleted, as only three levels on it have been created, and this is only found on two of them. This is just unnecessary at the moment, but if the levels get created, we can bring it back.
Proposer: Goomba (talk)
Deadline: Monday, May 27, at 23:59 GMT
Support
- Goomba (talk) Per proposal.
- BowserJunior (talk) Per Freakworld.
Oppose
- YoshiKong (talk) – We should only delete something if it is unnecessary and serves so purpose. That's not the case here at all: the template is there to provide navigation between the level articles, and it's perfectly allowed, even if most of the articles haven't been created. And what would be the point of deleting it if we had to code it all again when the articles are created? And how many articles must be created before the template is considered "necessary"? Think of it as a checklist, where a blue link is complete, and a red link still needs to be taken care of. Having the red links sitting there would at least let users know that those articles are needed. Not having them there at all would leave users in the dark that such articles need to be written. If we had a red link on a page, would we say to remove it until the page is created? Taking the approach that you are proposing is likely to make this seem like the best way to do things throughout the whole wiki, which it isn't. And Freakworld, you're saying that the level articles are redundant anyway, as they are already included in the world articles? This would go against our policy on level articles and this forum collab. thread, which deems that all individual game levels must have it's own article.
- King Pikante (talk) Per YoshiKong.
- Yoshi876 (talk) Per YoshiKong.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Per YoshiKong. All game levels must have it is own articles.
Comments
I have removed my oppose, because the template really is unnecessary (see above). -Freakworld (talk)
@YoshiKong Sorry, I didn't know that policy existed. I guess I will just leave this topic untouched as I don't want to violate anything. -Freakworld (talk)
