Category talk:Aquatic areas: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
:Agreed, I think I pointed this out on [[Sushi Cliff]] as it has a sea, but isn't itself a body of water. {{User|Yoshi876}}
:Agreed, I think I pointed this out on [[Sushi Cliff]] as it has a sea, but isn't itself a body of water. {{User|Yoshi876}}
::I also agree with Tucayo, that would be misleading to include everything that includes water. --{{User:Mariotime11/sig}} 16:43, 6 May 2013 (EDT)
::I also agree with Tucayo, that would be misleading to include everything that includes water. --{{User:Mariotime11/sig}} 16:43, 6 May 2013 (EDT)
:::Also agreed. If we want a category for areas next to water that's more inclusive than [[:Category:Beaches]], we ''could'' always use the name "Category:Waterfront Areas" (or plain "Waterfronts", or [http://www.macmillandictionary.com/thesaurus-category/british/Areas-of-land-around-rivers-lakes-and-seas something else to that effectl]). - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 17:15, 7 May 2013 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:15, May 7, 2013

It's pretty dumb to list every single location that features a body of water. This category should only include actual bodies of water, such as, but not limited to, rivers, lakes, seas, and oceans. Thoughts? --TucayoSig.png The 'Shroom 16:38, 6 May 2013 (EDT)

Agreed, I think I pointed this out on Sushi Cliff as it has a sea, but isn't itself a body of water. Yoshi876 (talk)
I also agree with Tucayo, that would be misleading to include everything that includes water. --driftmaster130 (TalkEdits) 16:43, 6 May 2013 (EDT)
Also agreed. If we want a category for areas next to water that's more inclusive than Category:Beaches, we could always use the name "Category:Waterfront Areas" (or plain "Waterfronts", or something else to that effectl). - Walkazo 17:15, 7 May 2013 (EDT)