Talk:Bomb Brother: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:They could all be split up into individual articles, however there is hardly any information/images to do this and make it look neat. It would be nicer though, as they are all sub-species of the Bomb Brother and there are plenty of articles featuring sub-species. | :They could all be split up into individual articles, however there is hardly any information/images to do this and make it look neat. It would be nicer though, as they are all sub-species of the Bomb Brother and there are plenty of articles featuring sub-species. | ||
:'''tl;dr''' It sounds unnecessary IMO. [[User:GBAToad|GBAToad]] ([[User talk:GBAToad|talk]]) 11:03, 24 April 2013 (EDT) | :'''tl;dr''' It sounds unnecessary IMO. [[User:GBAToad|GBAToad]] ([[User talk:GBAToad|talk]]) 11:03, 24 April 2013 (EDT) | ||
:'''EDIT:''' My misunderstanding is at fault here. As VARIATIONS (not sub-species), they should actually just have pictures added to them. [[User:GBAToad|GBAToad]] ([[User talk:GBAToad|talk]]) 11:33, 24 April 2013 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:33, April 24, 2013
Is it really necssary to put all Greenie ScareScraper ghsot in to this one article?
Kingfawful4321
- They could all be split up into individual articles, however there is hardly any information/images to do this and make it look neat. It would be nicer though, as they are all sub-species of the Bomb Brother and there are plenty of articles featuring sub-species.
- tl;dr It sounds unnecessary IMO. GBAToad (talk) 11:03, 24 April 2013 (EDT)
- EDIT: My misunderstanding is at fault here. As VARIATIONS (not sub-species), they should actually just have pictures added to them. GBAToad (talk) 11:33, 24 April 2013 (EDT)
