Talk:Star Marker: Difference between revisions
(→Oppose) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Also there is a precedent for short articles about different things having separate articles such as [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_31#Merge_10-Point_Star_and_20-Point_Star_to_Point_Star], [http://www.mariowiki.com/Talk:Kappa_Mountain], [http://www.mariowiki.com/Talk:Carrot], [http://www.mariowiki.com/Intense_Coincentration], and [http://www.mariowiki.com/Talk:Mad_Big_Boo#Merge_Mad_Big_Boo_with_Mad_Boo]. {{User|Marshal Dan Troop}} | Also there is a precedent for short articles about different things having separate articles such as [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_31#Merge_10-Point_Star_and_20-Point_Star_to_Point_Star], [http://www.mariowiki.com/Talk:Kappa_Mountain], [http://www.mariowiki.com/Talk:Carrot], [http://www.mariowiki.com/Intense_Coincentration], and [http://www.mariowiki.com/Talk:Mad_Big_Boo#Merge_Mad_Big_Boo_with_Mad_Boo]. {{User|Marshal Dan Troop}} | ||
I have read, on ''several'' talk page proposals before, that articles are not judged on their length, but on their completeness in detail. Yes, this article is short. Yes, the subject itself may seem minor or unimportant. However, does | I have read, on ''several'' talk page proposals before, that articles are not judged on their length, but on their completeness in detail. Yes, this article is short. Yes, the subject itself may seem minor or unimportant. However, does the article sufficiently cover all information necessary to successfully relay its subject's function? Expansion is always welcome, proving the additions are not redundant or in violation of writing style policy, but merging this fully sufficient article with another seems extraneous. {{User|Blue CosmicToad}} | ||
Revision as of 15:59, March 26, 2013
Merge with Power Star?
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Sunday, February 2, 2025, 03:58 GMT
Merge with Power Star
While they may be different things, this article is less than 500 characters long. This is way too short for an article, and should just be mentioned in the Super Mario 64 section on Power Stars.
Proposer: Goomba (talk)
Deadline: April 8th, 2013 at 23:59 GMT
Support
Oppose
- Marshal Dan Troop (talk) They are different things so they deserve different articles and imo just because something is short doesn't make it bad.
- Blue CosmicToad (talk) Per myself in the comments.
Comments
Also there is a precedent for short articles about different things having separate articles such as [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5]. Marshal Dan Troop (talk)
I have read, on several talk page proposals before, that articles are not judged on their length, but on their completeness in detail. Yes, this article is short. Yes, the subject itself may seem minor or unimportant. However, does the article sufficiently cover all information necessary to successfully relay its subject's function? Expansion is always welcome, proving the additions are not redundant or in violation of writing style policy, but merging this fully sufficient article with another seems extraneous. Blue CosmicToad (talk)
