MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Clockwork Ruins Galaxy: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (L151 moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N/Clockwork Ruins Galaxy to MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N1/Clockwork Ruins Galaxy without leaving a redirect: archive) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:Done. The article had a few imperatives, too many badly written sentences, and way too many pronoun disagreement. Fortunately, they are gone. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | :Done. The article had a few imperatives, too many badly written sentences, and way too many pronoun disagreement. Fortunately, they are gone. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
::I don't really think you "fixed" pronoun agreement. Some people may think that the former pronoun-antecedent is correct. Plus, "he or she" is super rambly. I suggest you either revise it to make "player" to "players" or changing "player" to "Mario/Luigi, Mario or Luigi" so we don't get to this type of argument. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ::I don't really think you "fixed" pronoun agreement. Some people may think that the former pronoun-antecedent is correct. Plus, "he or she" is super rambly. I suggest you either revise it to make "player" to "players" or changing "player" to "Mario/Luigi, Mario or Luigi" so we don't get to this type of argument. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
[[Category:FA succession archives]] | |||
Revision as of 22:01, March 12, 2013
Clockwork Ruins Galaxy
Template:Fa-archive Clockwork Ruins Galaxy was nominated for featured article at 3:45 on October 25, 2010 and passed at 17:05, 3 November 2010.
Support
- Gamefreak75 (talk) - I, along with others, worked very hard on this article. It is very well written and comes complete with plenty of pictures.
- Edofenrir (talk)
- Fuzzipede27 (talk)
- MrConcreteDonkey (talk)
- Toadwell (talk)
- Baby Mario Bloops (talk)
- New Super Mario (talk)
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
My only problem with the article is that some parts seem to be written in future tense (use the word "will"). It should all be in present tense. Fawfulfury65 (talk)
- Done. The article had a few imperatives, too many badly written sentences, and way too many pronoun disagreement. Fortunately, they are gone. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- I don't really think you "fixed" pronoun agreement. Some people may think that the former pronoun-antecedent is correct. Plus, "he or she" is super rambly. I suggest you either revise it to make "player" to "players" or changing "player" to "Mario/Luigi, Mario or Luigi" so we don't get to this type of argument. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
