MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Princess Daisy: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→‎Remove Featured Article Status: I'll stop at some point.)
Line 11: Line 11:
#{{User|YoshiKong}} Per all.
#{{User|YoshiKong}} Per all.
#{{User|ThePremiumYoshi}} - Per GreenDisaster.
#{{User|ThePremiumYoshi}} - Per GreenDisaster.
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} Per GD.


==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====

Revision as of 21:33, February 9, 2013

Princess Daisy

Remove Featured Article Status

  1. GreenDisaster (talk) This article is incredibly bare. While it covers almost every game that Daisy has appeared in, most of them only have one or two sentences that cover them. I understand that in some cases, there isn't much that can really be said, but how come Mario Party 3 is able to get a full paragraph, and yet Mario Party 6 only has a single sentence, and Mario Party 9 only has two? There are also quite a few sections that don't have images when it would be appreciated, such as the Super Smash Bros. Melee section. It would be nice to see what Peach looks like when she's colored with the Daisy palette, wouldn't it? Also, the comics, despite having so much available content to write about, are just as short as a lot of the other games. Certain games, like Mario Kart Arcade GP 2, Yakuman DS, Mario Party-e, and possibly others are only mentioned in Daisy's "List of Appearances by Date". A couple of the sentences from the "Relationships with Other Characters" section seem a bit conjectural to me, such as "Regardless, Daisy and Mario are good friends", "Daisy and Waluigi have a complex relationship", "Peach missed female companionship until Daisy's arrival in the Mushroom Kingdom" (the source doesn't link to anything relevant to the sentence, so I'm ignoring it), and possibly others. I also like (I'm using the word here sarcastically) how the article uses an image of Waluigi and Daisy in the same shot to illustrate their relationship. A few of the sections in "General Information" seem rather bare to me, too. To be honest, the article actually didn't look that bad at the time of its being featured when the old way of writing and formatting articles was considered, but today, I don't think this article can really keep its status without some improvement.
  2. Marshal Dan Troop (talk) Per GD
  3. Turboo (talk) - Per GD.
  4. YoshiKong (talk) Per all.
  5. ThePremiumYoshi (talk) - Per GreenDisaster.
  6. Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) Per GD.

Keep Featured Article Status

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

Comments