User talk:Monty Mole/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
(→Block) |
(→Block) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:You are correct in procedure, Spike, but there is a suspicious connection between 17, Wapiko., and Zeli. It's not good to have any of the three around. <span style="font-family:Kunstler Script; color:#006633;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Wayoshi|W]]'''ayoshi</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Wayoshi|T]]<tt>·</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Wayoshi|C]]<tt>·</tt>[[Special:Emailuser/Wayoshi|@]] )</small> 19:15, 4 October 2006 (EDT) | :You are correct in procedure, Spike, but there is a suspicious connection between 17, Wapiko., and Zeli. It's not good to have any of the three around. <span style="font-family:Kunstler Script; color:#006633;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Wayoshi|W]]'''ayoshi</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Wayoshi|T]]<tt>·</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Wayoshi|C]]<tt>·</tt>[[Special:Emailuser/Wayoshi|@]] )</small> 19:15, 4 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
:Thanks to [[Special:CheckUser]], Wapiko. and Zeli are the same person. All 3 have been blocked indefinitely. Right procedure, wrong situation of multiple trolls. :) <span style="font-family:Kunstler Script; color:#006633;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Wayoshi|W]]'''ayoshi</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Wayoshi|T]]<tt>·</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Wayoshi|C]]<tt>·</tt>[[Special:Emailuser/Wayoshi|@]] )</small> 19:19, 4 October 2006 (EDT) | :Thanks to [[Special:CheckUser]], Wapiko. and Zeli are the same person. All 3 have been blocked indefinitely. Right procedure, wrong situation of multiple trolls. :) <span style="font-family:Kunstler Script; color:#006633;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Wayoshi|W]]'''ayoshi</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Wayoshi|T]]<tt>·</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Wayoshi|C]]<tt>·</tt>[[Special:Emailuser/Wayoshi|@]] )</small> 19:19, 4 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
I must have not made myself clear entirely: | |||
*Spike was correct in procedure: one major vandalism edit and the user gets a warning; second major vandalism and the user is banned from a month to indefinitely. As just becoming a sysop two days ago, you were unaware of the standards, which is absolutely fine -- I'm not upset at all. | |||
*What was different was those three usernames on two IPs were connected somehow, and required infinite blocks on the spot. Not the best situation to start sysoping with. | |||
Keep up the good work. :) <span style="font-family:Kunstler Script; color:#006633;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Wayoshi|W]]'''ayoshi</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Wayoshi|T]]<tt>·</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Wayoshi|C]]<tt>·</tt>[[Special:Emailuser/Wayoshi|@]] )</small> 20:29, 4 October 2006 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:29, October 4, 2006
| Monty Mole Discussion Archives
|
|---|
New User Talk page
New Comments here
Templates
I really didn't know what I was doing; I just copied the HTML from an existing template and added my own words.
You can just copy the source from the Template: Super Strikes page and reword it. ;) Waluigi Freak 99 19:49, 24 September 2006 (EDT)
archive
can you make me an archive
I believe Wayoshi already solved your problem, Superchao. Monty Mole (Talk·Contribs) 17:05, 25 September 2006 (EDT)
Congrats
Welcome to the realm of sysophood. Thanks for all your great contributions. Keep it up! -- Son of Suns
Block
Although I am new to sysophood myself, I don't think your supposed to block a user on the first offense. (except sockpuppets) Although it is unlikely that the user will stop, even after a warning, you still should give the user a warning by adding {{lastwarn}} to the user's talk page. I don't mean to antagonize you because I know you had good intentions, but we are new to this stuff. I may be wrong as I just like giving people second chances.--SpikeFile:Spike sheild badge.PNG
- You are correct in procedure, Spike, but there is a suspicious connection between 17, Wapiko., and Zeli. It's not good to have any of the three around. Wayoshi ( T·C·@ ) 19:15, 4 October 2006 (EDT)
- Thanks to Special:CheckUser, Wapiko. and Zeli are the same person. All 3 have been blocked indefinitely. Right procedure, wrong situation of multiple trolls. :) Wayoshi ( T·C·@ ) 19:19, 4 October 2006 (EDT)
I must have not made myself clear entirely:
- Spike was correct in procedure: one major vandalism edit and the user gets a warning; second major vandalism and the user is banned from a month to indefinitely. As just becoming a sysop two days ago, you were unaware of the standards, which is absolutely fine -- I'm not upset at all.
- What was different was those three usernames on two IPs were connected somehow, and required infinite blocks on the spot. Not the best situation to start sysoping with.
Keep up the good work. :) Wayoshi ( T·C·@ ) 20:29, 4 October 2006 (EDT)
