Talk:Fort Francis: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
RandomYoshi (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{talk|Too much trivia}} ==Trivia== The trivia for this article is ''quite'' expansive, which isn't a good sign, is it? I say that we could create a sub-section called "Franci...") |
m (Resolved; trivia has since been incorporated.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Trivia== | ==Trivia== | ||
The trivia for this article is ''quite'' expansive, which isn't a good sign, is it? I say that we could create a sub-section called "Francis' Rooms" where most of the information listed in the first entry is to be located at so that the trivia-section doesn't look like a clutter of information lazily put there just because there wasn't an appropriate sub-header to put it under. I'd also like to move the second entry to the main body of the article, but seeing as it would be such a minor edit I'm going to make that edit whether anyone agrees or not. {{User:RandomYoshi/sig}} 06:30, 14 March 2012 (EDT) | The trivia for this article is ''quite'' expansive, which isn't a good sign, is it? I say that we could create a sub-section called "Francis' Rooms" where most of the information listed in the first entry is to be located at so that the trivia-section doesn't look like a clutter of information lazily put there just because there wasn't an appropriate sub-header to put it under. I'd also like to move the second entry to the main body of the article, but seeing as it would be such a minor edit I'm going to make that edit whether anyone agrees or not. {{User:RandomYoshi/sig}} 06:30, 14 March 2012 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:14, October 10, 2012
Trivia[edit]
The trivia for this article is quite expansive, which isn't a good sign, is it? I say that we could create a sub-section called "Francis' Rooms" where most of the information listed in the first entry is to be located at so that the trivia-section doesn't look like a clutter of information lazily put there just because there wasn't an appropriate sub-header to put it under. I'd also like to move the second entry to the main body of the article, but seeing as it would be such a minor edit I'm going to make that edit whether anyone agrees or not. 
RandomYoshi( • PMs • ) 06:30, 14 March 2012 (EDT)
