MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Koopa Bros.: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (this is over a year old) |
(opps my bad some one edited the redirect which tripped me up) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
#{{User|Booderdash}} Per Fuzzipede27 | #{{User|Booderdash}} Per Fuzzipede27 | ||
#{{User|CosmicRedToad}} Per Booderdash. | #{{User|CosmicRedToad}} Per Booderdash. | ||
#{{User:Green Falcon}} I say it should stay. There is nothing wrong with it. I think it does have enough info to keep FA status. And it has stragedies. Keep it, or Bowser will send his minions after you! | |||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== |
Revision as of 18:32, August 25, 2011
Koopa Bros.
Remove Featured Article Status
Keep Featured Article Status
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) There is no more template. It's still quite long for a group of characters that only appeared in one game. I don't see where this article lacks information either.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Like what I said earlier, what information does it lack? The template ceases to exist. It's long enough to maintain a featured article standard
- Fuzzipede27 (talk) Per all.
- Booderdash (talk) Per Fuzzipede27
- CosmicRedToad (talk) Per Booderdash.
- User:Green Falcon I say it should stay. There is nothing wrong with it. I think it does have enough info to keep FA status. And it has stragedies. Keep it, or Bowser will send his minions after you!
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Comments
What info does it lack? It seems to have all information possible. Plus, the tense template ceases to exist, since I corrected it. The article is just long enough, in my opinion. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
@BPK497: What areas are lacking in information? Fawfulfury65 (talk)
Isn't this failed? No supporters... Booderdash (talk)