MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Badge: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{UNFANOMFAIL
|nominated=<!--Sign with FIVE tildes(~) here to put the exact date of the nomination. -->02:14, 26 April 2011 (EDT)  
|nominated=<!--Sign with FIVE tildes(~) here to put the exact date of the nomination. -->02:14, 26 April 2011 (EDT)  
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=02:14, July 26th, 2011 (GMT)
|nosupport=true
}}
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====  
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====  

Revision as of 22:37, July 25, 2011

Badge

Badge was nominated to be unfeatured at 02:14, 26 April 2011 (EDT).

Badge failed unfeaturing requirements at 02:14, 26 July 2011, and is currently able to be renominated.

Remove Featured Article Status

Keep Featured Article Status

  1. Gamefreak75 (talk) There's really no info you can add. 0_0 Also, the info is already there. (i.e. Fire Drive plainly says that it costs 5 FP and burns enemies on the ground.) Other than that, your arguement is full of fallacies. Keep it.
  2. Mario4Ever (talk) This article has no issues that warrant it losing its featured status.
  3. Yoshiwaker (talk) Per both.
  4. UltraMario3000 (talk) Per MarioFourEver and the 75 Gamefreaks.
  5. New Super Mario (talk) Per UltraMario
  6. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Some images in the article have white instead of transparent backgrounds, but that really only matters if users have a CSS that doesn't include white backgrounds. Otherwise, the information on the badges, I believe, comes directly from the game. I think better places to look for more information on badges are game strategy sites, like GameFAQS, StrategyWiki, etc. And even if the article SHOULD be split into a bajillion badge articles, that doesn't necessarily means it should be unfeatured.
  7. Reddragon19k (talk) - Leave it featured! Per all!
  8. Mario Bros.! (talk) - The article for badges is great.
  9. BoygeyDude (talk) Per all :)
  10. 20jiayiming (talk) Badges are so awesome.

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

All Oppose Votes

  1. yoshiyoshiyoshi (talk)This shouldnt be one article.If every Microgame and Item has it's own article,then so should every badge.

20jiayiming

  1. Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) no valid reason
  2. Superfiremario (talk) Per GS15.
  3. Mario Bros.! (talk) Per all.

Comments

I think there should be a List of badges article for each game at least yoshiyoshiyoshi (talk)

If i want to know if simplifier makes it easier to dodge attacks,then icant :(
— The preceding unsigned comment was added by yoshiyoshiyoshi (talk).

Then blame Intelligent Systems for not telling if it does or not. Yoshiwaker (talk)
As per a proposal that I somehow remember (please don't laugh at me...), all badges should be merged into one Badge article. Marioguy1 (talk)
Can't find a proposal like that in the proposal archives. Reversinator (talk)

I just made proposal against that.It states that it gets split into 5 articles,one for each game they appear in.
— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yoshiyoshiyoshi (talk).

I meant the article is great. Mario Bros.! (talk)

Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/Unfeature/N1/Badge&oldid=1102786"