MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/King K. Rool: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}: Request for unfeaturing lacks any kind of reason.
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}: Request for unfeaturing by original requester lacked any kind of reason. Now, I fixed the minor problems, so I don't see the problem. This article contains as much information as I believe it possibly can, and I'm sure others can agree with me.
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per MCD.
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per MCD.
#{{User|KoopaStrikerCharged}} I think that it should keep the status because sure it's written in the past tense, but anyone can fix it. In fact, I might even start fixing it myself.
#{{User|KoopaStrikerCharged}} I think that it should keep the status because sure it's written in the past tense, but anyone can fix it. In fact, I might even start fixing it myself.
Line 16: Line 16:
#{{User|Dr Javelin}} Fixed a couple of tenses. Looks good to me.
#{{User|Dr Javelin}} Fixed a couple of tenses. Looks good to me.
#{{User|New Super Mario}} Per MCD
#{{User|New Super Mario}} Per MCD
#{{User|Stelios7}} Per MCD! :D  
#{{User|Stelios7}} Per MCD! :D


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====

Revision as of 14:21, July 17, 2011

King K. Rool

King K. Rool, a featured article, was nominated to be unfeatured at 21:30, 12 June 2011. If the nomination does not pass by 21:30, 11 August 2011, it will be considered failed.

Remove Featured Article Status

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) I know I didn't make this nomination, but the tense is not correct, it's written in the past tense. Also, most sections are missing images. King K. Rool also appeared in one Super Mario-Kun comic. Thus the history is incomplete, meaning it can't stay featured.
  2. Mario Bros.! (talk) Per DKP99

Keep Featured Article Status

  1. MrConcreteDonkey (talk): Request for unfeaturing by original requester lacked any kind of reason. Now, I fixed the minor problems, so I don't see the problem. This article contains as much information as I believe it possibly can, and I'm sure others can agree with me.
  2. UltraMario3000 (talk) Per MCD.
  3. KoopaStrikerCharged (talk) I think that it should keep the status because sure it's written in the past tense, but anyone can fix it. In fact, I might even start fixing it myself.
  4. Reddragon19k (talk) Per MCD!
  5. Dr Javelin (talk) Fixed a couple of tenses. Looks good to me.
  6. New Super Mario (talk) Per MCD
  7. Stelios7 (talk) Per MCD! :D

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

MrConcreteDonkey

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) Now there is reasons.

KoopaStrikerCharged

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) All of the rest of the page is written in past tense.

Dr Javelin

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) All tense isn't fixed. And no, it is not good yet.

Comments

WTF? Well, the tense isn't consistent. I hope Superrewinder isn't a mindless user nominating this for no reason. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

That user didn't vote too, so I have a feeling Superrewinder did nominate for no reason. Mario jc (talk)

Well I have a reason and we can't just ignore the fact that the article is in horrible shape. DKPetey99 (talk)

Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/Unfeature/N1/King_K._Rool&oldid=1096009"