MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Boo: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(LGM mentions other stuff besides removed template)
Line 31: Line 31:


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====
=====Reversinator====
#{{User|DKPetey99}} Template is gone! Tense has been corrected
=====Iggykoopa=====
#{{User|DKPetey99}} No more template.
=====Mario4Ever=====
#{{User|DKPetey99}} Template is gone.
=====Yoshiwaker=====
#{{User|DKPetey99}} Referring to votes that refer to template. Template is gone.
=====Fawfulfury65=====
#{{User|DKPetey99}} Template is gone.
=====Catboy41=====
{{User|DKPetey99}} Same as reasons of Yoshiwaker's removal.
=====Reddragon19k=====
#{{User|DKPetey99}} Same reasons as Yoshiwaker's removal and Catboy41.
==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
<s>@'''DKPetey''' Who are you to decide who does or does not deserve to be on and use the wiki? {{User|Mario4Ever}}</s>
<s>@'''DKPetey''' Who are you to decide who does or does not deserve to be on and use the wiki? {{User|Mario4Ever}}</s>
:''[[User:DKPetey99|He]]'' didn't say that, ''[[User:KingBooFan|he]]'' did. {{User|Yoshiwaker}}
:''[[User:DKPetey99|He]]'' didn't say that, ''[[User:KingBooFan|he]]'' did. {{User|Yoshiwaker}}

Revision as of 15:53, May 12, 2011

Boo

"Boo" was nominated for featured article status at 6:57, April 7, 2011 (GMT). If the nomination does not pass by 06:57, 6 June 2011, it will be considered failed.

Support

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) This article is in pretty good shape and I have to say, it is one of the best articles the wiki has to offer!
  2. Yoshidude99 (talk)
  3. KingBooFan (talk)
  4. Tails777 (talk)
  5. Weegee010 (talk)
  6. Fawful117 (talk)
  7. Lucas777123 (talk)
  8. yoshiyoshiyoshi (talk)
  9. Booigi2221 (talk)
  10. Steverocks27 (talk)
  11. Phantom Bowser (talk)
  12. Conanshinichi (talk)
  13. Mario7727 (talk)

Oppose

  1. Reversinator (talk) There are two improvement templates. That alone is enough to oppose.
  2. Iggykoopa (talk) rule 5 does state that no article can be nomminated with an improvment template so the rules say no
  3. Mario4Ever (talk) To meet criteria for Featured status, an article cannot have any sort of improvement tags on it. This article has a rewrite tag on it, and until the issue is addressed (I don't have to do this myself because I am not responsible for helping this article achieve Featured status if I oppose the measure), I will not and can not support this.
  4. Yoshiwaker (talk) Per all.
  5. Fawfulfury65 (talk) Rewrite template. Featured articles must be flawless.
  6. Catboy41 (talk) Same as all reasons above.
  7. Reddragon19k (talk) Per all!
  8. LeftyGreenMario (talk) This nomination came back to haunt us. Anyway, all opposers during the time of this vote are just merely stating the rewrite tag, but I'll try to be more specific. The Mario Party section needs expansion (it only covers a few out of all games). The tense isn't consistent. The Mario Power Tennis section also needs expansion. I think the article itself needs a bit of sprucing up too. I hope this vote is the most useful of all of them.

Removal of Opposes

=Reversinator

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) Template is gone! Tense has been corrected
Iggykoopa
  1. DKPetey99 (talk) No more template.
Mario4Ever
  1. DKPetey99 (talk) Template is gone.
Yoshiwaker
  1. DKPetey99 (talk) Referring to votes that refer to template. Template is gone.
Fawfulfury65
  1. DKPetey99 (talk) Template is gone.
Catboy41

DKPetey99 (talk) Same as reasons of Yoshiwaker's removal.

Reddragon19k
  1. DKPetey99 (talk) Same reasons as Yoshiwaker's removal and Catboy41.

Comments

@DKPetey Who are you to decide who does or does not deserve to be on and use the wiki? Mario4Ever (talk)

He didn't say that, he did. Yoshiwaker (talk)
Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N2/Boo&oldid=1032250"