MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Shadow Mario

[[Shadow Mario]]

|Template:Fa-archive <Shadow Mario> was nominated for featured article/to be unfeatured at <02:48, 2 May 2011> and passed at <02:26, 3 May 2011> |nominated=02:48, 2 May 2011 (GMT) |passed=02:26, 3 May 2011 }}

Support

1. Phoenix (talk) Article is of adequate length, is written well, accurate, has good pictures, no red links, and generally appears to meet the standards of a Featured Article.
2. Yoshidude99 (talk)
3. Mario4Ever (talk)
4. UltraMario3000 (talk)
5. Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
6. Tails777 (talk)
7. New Super Mario (talk)

Comments

Sheesh, not trying to insult anybody or put anyone down, but the term, "well written" has little meaning. I had to fix up a bunch of errors (including tense, informal phrases, prepositions, etc) at the time this got nominated. Some could have opposed it (read: LeftyGreenMario, ha) because of that. Luckily I fixed all of that. I recommend that in any future nominations that you proof-read before you nominate it! Just a recommendation. Not a demand. I hope we understand :). This article is fine now, there might be several stuff I missed. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

It can always be fixed up during the nomination process. Minor flaws aren't too much to worry about, so long as there are no improvement tags or anything of the sort. Mario4Ever (talk)

What I found in this article, I could have put a rewrite tag up or a tense tag up if I didn't feel like editing all of that text. I think it's pretty major, IMO, when there are a moderate number of errors in a page this size. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

@BLOF i think i got everything down. Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)