Talk:Nintendo DSi: Difference between revisions
Yoshiwaker (talk | contribs) (→Oppose) |
Reddragon19k (talk | contribs) (→Oppose) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
#{{User|Kaptain K. Rool}} - NO! This is a different system that has the DS features, but yet still has a lot more stuff to do on it than the plain DS. | #{{User|Kaptain K. Rool}} - NO! This is a different system that has the DS features, but yet still has a lot more stuff to do on it than the plain DS. | ||
#{{User|Yoshiwaker}} - Per KKR. | #{{User|Yoshiwaker}} - Per KKR. | ||
#{{User|Reddragon19k}} - Per both. | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
I fixed the formatting: new sections (including TPPs) go on the ''bottom'' of a page, and TPPs run for two weeks, not one, without an initial 24-hour voting start delay. This was proposed on the 11th, so it ends on the 25th. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 13:06, 11 April 2011 (EDT) | I fixed the formatting: new sections (including TPPs) go on the ''bottom'' of a page, and TPPs run for two weeks, not one, without an initial 24-hour voting start delay. This was proposed on the 11th, so it ends on the 25th. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 13:06, 11 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:32, April 11, 2011
Merge?
I don't understant why should Nintendo DSi have it's own page, since it's in the DS series. I suggest you to merge it with the Nintendo DS article.--Internetakias 09:30, 6 April 2011 (EDT)
- If you think so, then make a proposal.
Yoshiwaker File:Orange Yoshi TTYD.PNG 09:46, 6 April 2011 (EDT)
- If you did this then we would have to merge the 3DS into the DS page aswell. And does that make sense? No. It's an entirely different system. --SuperYoshiBros 09:59, 6 April 2011 (EDT)
- The DSi/DSiXL is a member in the DS series, the 3DS isn't.--Internetakias 10:08, 11 April 2011 (EDT)
- If you did this then we would have to merge the 3DS into the DS page aswell. And does that make sense? No. It's an entirely different system. --SuperYoshiBros 09:59, 6 April 2011 (EDT)
Merge Nintendo DSi with Nintendo DS
The Nintendo DSi article should be merged with the Nintendo DS article because A. It's a member of the DS series, B. The other redesign of the Nintendo DS, Nintendo DS lite doesn't have a page. So, why should this redesign have a page?
Proposer: Internetakias (talk)
Deadline: April 25, 2011, 23:59 GMT
Support
- Internetakias (talk) Per my proposal.
Oppose
- Kaptain K. Rool (talk) - NO! This is a different system that has the DS features, but yet still has a lot more stuff to do on it than the plain DS.
- Yoshiwaker (talk) - Per KKR.
- Reddragon19k (talk) - Per both.
Comments
I fixed the formatting: new sections (including TPPs) go on the bottom of a page, and TPPs run for two weeks, not one, without an initial 24-hour voting start delay. This was proposed on the 11th, so it ends on the 25th. - Walkazo 13:06, 11 April 2011 (EDT)
