MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Mario (series): Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
#{{User|Iggykoopa}} i wanted to vote yes but since it's incomplete it can't be the best the wiki has to offer per all
#{{User|Iggykoopa}} i wanted to vote yes but since it's incomplete it can't be the best the wiki has to offer per all
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} You can't just ignore the construction template like that. The template means that the article needs more information and improvement. The article is missing many information. This article is long, but is a far cry from featured status.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} You can't just ignore the construction template like that. The template means that the article needs more information and improvement. The article is missing many information. This article is long, but is a far cry from featured status.
#{{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} Even if it is a very popular page, you can't just judge it by the cover, you need to read deep into it. There is way to much missing into this page, and though I hate to say that I feel bad for this page because it is always needing updating, it probably will take a lot to become a FA.


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====

Revision as of 00:20, April 2, 2011

Mario (series)

Support

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) This is probably the second main page of this wiki! It is the Mario series with everything that contains everything Mario. Forget the construction template, besides that, it is a superb page!
  2. Reddragon19k (talk)
  3. DK and Diddy Kong vs Bowser and Bowser Jr. (talk)
  4. Weegee010 (talk) Who wouldn't support the Mario Series page to be a featured page? This page is the page this wiki is centered around!

Oppose

  1. Fawfulfury65 (talk) Missing several games, such as Mario Strikers Charged, and many of the recently released games, such as Mario Spots Mix, are lacking information.
  2. UltraMario3000 (talk) Per the crazy lab experiment made with the DNA of a Hammer Bro. and Fawful.
  3. Yoshiwaker (talk) Besides the conctruction template? Per the Mario with lame puns.
  4. Iggykoopa (talk) i wanted to vote yes but since it's incomplete it can't be the best the wiki has to offer per all
  5. LeftyGreenMario (talk) You can't just ignore the construction template like that. The template means that the article needs more information and improvement. The article is missing many information. This article is long, but is a far cry from featured status.
  6. Baby Mario Bloops (talk) Even if it is a very popular page, you can't just judge it by the cover, you need to read deep into it. There is way to much missing into this page, and though I hate to say that I feel bad for this page because it is always needing updating, it probably will take a lot to become a FA.

Removal of Opposes

Comments

DK and Diddy Kong vs Bowser and Bowser Jr. (talk) Thanks for beating me, Reddragon19k.

@Fawfulfury65, you can still add to it!
Why don't you? He may not own the missing games, thus he can't add the missing info. Reversinator (talk)
@Reversinator, just to let you FF65 is female.--UM3000 E-102 Gamma.png

@DKPetey99: It doesn't matter if it's the second main page. They quality of it is what matters. Also, the construction template is an improvement template, which is not allowed on featured articles. Also, I'd like to add to this article, but I'm a little busy with other articles. Fawfulfury65 (talk)

Now that I'm starting to fix this, isn't Birdo a villain? Why is she under protagonists? DKPetey99 13:31, 1 April 2011 (EDT)

Its in pretty good shape as of now. What other games are missing? Tell me and I will add them! DKPetey99 (talk) 14:18, 1 April 2011 (EDT)

@DKPetey99 not anymore she hasn't been a villain since Super Mario RPG Iggykoopa (talk)