Category talk:Mollusks: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
(→Delete) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Delete== | ==Delete== | ||
I propose we delete this, since it's just the Bloopers with [[Squid]] and [[Octo (squid)]]. It's a waste of space and in no way enhances Wiki navigation. Anyone oppose? - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 13:24, 7 January 2011 (EST) | I propose we delete this, since it's just the Bloopers with [[Squid]] and [[Octo (squid)]]. It's a waste of space and in no way enhances Wiki navigation. Anyone oppose? - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 13:24, 7 January 2011 (EST) | ||
:I think you should find all of the categories like [[Category:Reptiles and Amphibians|Reptiles and Amphibians]] and post them in one proposal. {{User:SWFlash/Sig}} | |||
Revision as of 08:55, January 12, 2011
Template:Talktobedeleted Err, shouldn't this be Template:Fakelink? I mean, Bloopers are never actually confirmed to be squids. — Stooben Rooben 21:05, 22 November 2008 (EST)
- Well, this category includes other squid-like creatures outside of the Mario series. Personally it doesn't seem very neccessary, but I guess someone may want info only on squid-like enemies. Regardless, a Bloopers category would be helpful, as there are quite a few Blooper varieties these days (although they'll always be Bloobers to me). -- Son of Suns
- Then would you suggest making the Blooper category a sub-category of this one? — Stooben Rooben 01:27, 23 November 2008 (EST)
- Sounds good to me uper-Yoshi
- Sounds good to me uper-Yoshi
- Then would you suggest making the Blooper category a sub-category of this one? — Stooben Rooben 01:27, 23 November 2008 (EST)
Delete
I propose we delete this, since it's just the Bloopers with Squid and Octo (squid). It's a waste of space and in no way enhances Wiki navigation. Anyone oppose? - Walkazo 13:24, 7 January 2011 (EST)
- I think you should find all of the categories like and post them in one proposal. SWFlash
