Talk:Mario Bros.-e: Difference between revisions
MarioManiac (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→Merge) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
#{{User|Zero777}} I am Zero! Per comments above. Zero signing out. | #{{User|Zero777}} I am Zero! Per comments above. Zero signing out. | ||
#{{User|MarioManiac}} Per proposal. | #{{User|MarioManiac}} Per proposal. | ||
#{{User|Garlic Stapler}} Per proposal | |||
====Don't Merge==== | ====Don't Merge==== | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
@ Fuzzipede27 Yes, we have an article for [[Mario Party-e]] because '''it is its own game'''. Mario Bros.-e is just a port.-{{User:Its-a-me Yoshi!/sig}} | @ Fuzzipede27 Yes, we have an article for [[Mario Party-e]] because '''it is its own game'''. Mario Bros.-e is just a port.-{{User:Its-a-me Yoshi!/sig}} | ||
I confirm this as I actually have it on my eReader along with Donkey Kong jr. and a few pokemon ereader games. | |||
Revision as of 09:24, November 15, 2010
Merge
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
As far as I know, the e-Reader games are exact ports of the NES games, so this should be merged with Mario Bros.. We also merged the Classic NES Series with the respective original games. --Grandy02 09:38, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
Don't Merge it with the NES version.
Dark
Lakitu 789 
- this article is a stub so it should be merged into it KS3 (talk · contribute)
- Just because something is a stub, it doesn't mean it needs to be merged. There's something called expanding, you know. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- This game is the same as the NES version, though, just on a different platform. There is no reason for a separate article. --Grandy02 09:36, 18 February 2010 (EST)
- Just because something is a stub, it doesn't mean it needs to be merged. There's something called expanding, you know. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
it should merge because it is considered as a remake of the game
The preceding unsigned comment was added by SuperGamerX17 (talk).
- I wouldn't even consider it a remake. It is just an emulation of the NES game. --Grandy02 12:26, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
I agree to merge it. It is the EXACT SAME as the NES version, only on a GameBoy Advance E-Reader. Indeed, there is no reason for the E-Reader version to have it's own article. --Killer Axe
Merge
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 13:36 GMT
As you can see in the comments above, this is mostly an emulation and not a remake. I propose that we should merge them.
Proposer:Its-a-me Yoshi! (talk)
Deadline: 23:59, 27 November 2010 GMT
Merge
- Its-a-me Yoshi! (talk) Per Proposal.
- Zero777 (talk) I am Zero! Per comments above. Zero signing out.
- MarioManiac (talk) Per proposal.
- Garlic Stapler (talk) Per proposal
Don't Merge
Comments
Remember this is an emulation. Its an exact port from the NES version. I can see why SMAS+SMW was split, but I can't see why this was split if its the same game on a different port.--
Its-a-meYoshi!
We have an Article for Mario Party-e so we should keep this one. 
GalladeBlades
@ Fuzzipede27 Yes, we have an article for Mario Party-e because it is its own game. Mario Bros.-e is just a port.-Its-a-meYoshi!
I confirm this as I actually have it on my eReader along with Donkey Kong jr. and a few pokemon ereader games.
