MarioWiki:Proposals: Difference between revisions
m (→Use Full Names) |
Time Turner (talk | contribs) (→Miscellaneous: I'm in a different time period than the one used for the wikl, so could someone change the time?) |
||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
==Miscellaneous== | ==Miscellaneous== | ||
===Making a Power Glove article=== | ===Making a Power Glove article=== | ||
Line 142: | Line 141: | ||
*{{User|M&SG}} - Abbreviations should only be used when the game's full name is shown BEFORE the abbreviation is used. That way, people won't get too confused. | *{{User|M&SG}} - Abbreviations should only be used when the game's full name is shown BEFORE the abbreviation is used. That way, people won't get too confused. | ||
===The prefix "List of"=== | |||
There are 166 lists on the wiki. 105 have the prefix "List of". The rest don't. We need concistency. Either we remove List of, or we add list of. I prefer removing it, because list of is unnecessary. While some of you might argue that people wouldn't know what is a list and what isn't, most of the articles that have list of are articles that people would expect to be lists. | |||
'''Proposer''': {{User|Reversinator}}<br> | |||
'''Voting start''': October 1, 1:04 PM | |||
'''Deadline''': October 7, 23:59 GMT | |||
====Remove "List of" from all lists==== | |||
#{{User|Reversinator}} Per me. | |||
====Add "List of" to all lists==== | |||
====Leave the list titles alone==== | |||
====Comments==== |
Revision as of 12:05, September 30, 2010
Proposals can be new features (such as an extension), removal of a previously added feature that has tired out, or new policies that must be approved via consensus before any action(s) are done.
|
A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed using the code {{User|User name}}.
This page observes the No-Signature Policy.
How To
- Actions that users feel are appropriate to have community approval first can be added by anyone, but they must have a strong argument.
- Users then start to discuss on the issue. 24 hours after posting the proposal (rounding up or down to the next or previous full hour, respectively, is allowed), the voting period begins. (The proposer is allowed to support their proposal right after posting.) Each proposal ends at the end of the day one week after voting start. (All times GMT).
- Every vote should have a reason accompanying it. Agreeing or seconding a previously mentioned reason given by another user is accepted.
- Users who feel that certain votes were cast in bad faith or which truly have no merit can address the votes in the Comments section. Users can ask a voter to clarify their position, point out mistakes or flaws in their arguments, or call for the outright removal of the vote if it lacks sufficient reasoning. Users may not remove or alter the content of anyone else's votes. The voter can remove or rewrite his/her own vote at any time, but the final decision to remove another User's vote lies solely with the Administrators.
- All proposals that end up in a tie will be extended for another week.
- If a proposal has more than ten votes, it can only pass or fail by a margin of three votes. If a proposal reaches the deadline and the total number of votes for each option differ by two or less votes, the deadline will be extended for another week.
- Any proposal that has three votes or less at deadline will automatically be listed as "NO QUORUM." The original proposer then has the option to relist said proposal to generate more discussion.
- No proposal can overturn the decision of a previous proposal that is less than 4 weeks (28 days) old.
- Proposals can only be rewritten or deleted by their proposer within the first three days of their creation. However, the proposer can request that their proposal be deleted by a Sysop at any time, provided they have a valid reason for it.
- All proposals are archived. The original proposer must take action accordingly if the outcome of the proposal dictates it. If it requires the help of a Sysop, the proposer can ask for that help.
- There shouldn't be proposals about creating articles on a underrepresented or completely absent subject, unless there is major disagreement about whether the content should be included. To organize efforts about completing articles on missing subjects, try creating a PipeProject.
- Proposals cannot be made about System Operator promotions and demotions. Sysops can only be promoted and demoted by the will of Bureaucrats.
- If the Sysops deem a proposal unnecessary or potentially detrimental to the upkeep of the Super Mario Wiki, they have the right to remove it at any time.
- No joke proposals. Proposals are serious wiki matters, and should be handled professionally. Joke proposals will be deleted on sight.
The times are in GMT, and are set so that the user is more likely to be online at those times (after work/school, weekend nights). If a proposal is added on Monday night at 23:59 GMT, the deadline is the night of the Tuesday of the next week at 23:59 PM. If it is posted a minute later, the deadline is 23:59 PM of the Wednesday of the next week, since midnight is considered to be part of the next day, as 00:00 AM.
Basic Proposal and Support/Oppose Format
This is an example how your proposal should look like, if you want it to be acknowledged. If you are inexperienced or unsure how to set up this format, simply copy the following and paste it into the fitting section. Then replace the [subject] - variables with information to customize your proposal, so it says what you wish. If you insert the information, be sure to replace the whole variable including the squared brackets, so "[insert info here]" becomes "This is the inserted information", not "[This is the inserted information]".
===[insert a title for your Proposal here]===
[describe what issue this Proposal is about and what changes you think should be made to improve how the Wiki handles that issue]
'''Proposer''': {{User|[enter your username here]}}<br>
'''Voting start''': [insert a voting start time here, f.e. "2 January, 2010, 14:00". Voting start times are 24 hours after the time at which the proposal was posted, as described in Rule 2 above.]<br>
'''Deadline''': [insert a deadline here, 7 days after the voting start, at 23:59 GMT.]
====Support====
#{{User|[enter your username here]}} [make a statement indicating that you support your proposal]
====Oppose====
====Comments====
Users will now be able to vote on your Proposal, until the set deadline is reached. Remember, you are a user as well, so you can vote on your own Proposal just like the others.
To support, or oppose, just insert "#{{User|[add your username here]}} at the bottom of the section of your choice. Just don't forget to add a valid reason for your vote behind that tag if you are voting on another user's Proposal. If you are voting on your own Proposal, you can just say "Per my Proposal".
Talk Page Proposals
All proposals dealing with a single article or a specific group of articles are held on the talk page of one of the articles in question. Proposals dealing with massive amounts of splits, merges or deletions across the Wiki should still be held on this page.
How To
- All active talk page proposals must be listed below in chronological order (new proposals go at the bottom). All pages effected must be mentioned in the brief description, with the talk page housing the discussion linked to directly via "(Template:Fakelink)". If the proposal involved a page that is not yet made, use {{fakelink}} to communicate its title. The Deadline must also be included in the entry. Linking to pages not directly involved in the talk page proposal is not recommended, as it clutters the list with unnecessary links. Place {{TPP}} under the heading.
- All rules for talk page proposals are the same as mainspace proposals (see the "How To" section above), with the exceptions made by Rules 3 and 4 as follows:
- Voting in talk page proposals will be open for two weeks, not one. There is no 24 hour delay between the posting of a talk page proposal and the commencement of voting.
- Talk page proposals may be closed by the proposer if both the support and the oppose sides each have fewer than five votes.
- The talk page proposal must pertain to the article it is posted on.
List of Talk Page Proposals
- Merge Super Mario All-Stars Super Mario World into Super Mario All-Stars (Discuss) Deadline: October 1, 2010 12:20 GMT
- Split Tinga and Inga (Discuss) Deadline: October 14th, 2010, 23:59 GMT.
New Features
None at the moment
Removals
None at the moment.
Changes
None at the moment.
Miscellaneous
Making a Power Glove article
I think we should make a article for the failed accessorie, the power glove. We have a article for the Atari 2600 and the Virtual boy, so why not make a power glove article. I will put in codes the players need to use to play the games.
Proposer: Fuzzipede27 (talk)
Voting start: 25 September, 2010, 10:00 GMT
Deadline: 2 October, 2010, 10:00 GMT.
Support
- Fuzzipede27 (talk) Per proposal
- Tomz123 (talk) What would a Super Mario Wiki without those kinds of stuff?
Oppose
- Reversinator (talk) Atari 2600 and Virtual Boy are consoles that had Mario titles. The Power Glove is an accessory that didn't have any Mario games specifically made for it.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Unless the power glove have any sort of Mario stuff on it, we are supposed to cover Mario-related content, not Nintendo content in general.
- MrConcreteDonkey (talk) Per all.
- Zero777 (talk) I am Zero! Per all. Zero signing out.
- Basurao Pokabu Waribiaru Zeburaika Zuruguu A (talk) At Tomz123, it would be the Super Mario Wiki. Not making an appearance in any Mario game (besides cameo) or Super Smash Bros. game makes it not notable.
- Smasher 101 (talk)Per all.
- Booderdash (talk) Per all
- JF (talk) Mario has, like, nothing to do with the Power Glove.
- Frostyfireyoshi (talk) "I LOVE THE POWER GLOVE!! IT'S SO ...totally non-Mario." The only connections are Nintendo & that awesome film, The Wizard.
- Mechayoshi (talk)per all. It's not mario at all.
Comments
Did the Power Glove have any Mario games made for it period? I don't care about new ones, were any games made for the power glove that featured Mario or one of the Mario characters? Marioguy1 (talk)
- The Wikipedia article doesn't say anything about Mario at all, so no. Reversinator (talk)
- Were there any Mario games that had used the power glove as an item/feature/cameo/etc? LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- No. MrConcreteDonkey (talk)
- I am Zero! @LGM Fail. Zero signing out. Zero777 (talk)
- @LGM I think there's a cameo of it in a WarioWare game, but that alone doesn't merit an article. Reversinator (talk)
- I am Zero! @LGM Fail. Zero signing out. Zero777 (talk)
- No. MrConcreteDonkey (talk)
- Were there any Mario games that had used the power glove as an item/feature/cameo/etc? LeftyGreenMario (talk)
I don't even know hat a Power Glove is. Can someone explain it to me? Commander Code-8 (talk)
- @CC-8: I'm sure that nobody here can explain better than wikipedia does. Marioguy1 (talk)
And You are.....?
I just notice in some sections of articles, they refer to the game by an abbreviation (SSBB is an example) or by another name usually just a shorten version of the game title (Brawl another example). So we should have this settled once and for all, should we refer to Video game titles only by there full name in mainspace or still refer them by their abbreviations?
Proposer: Zero777 (talk)
Voting start: 28 September, 2010, 21:30
Deadline: 4 October, 2010, 21:30
Use Full Names
- Zero777 (talk) I am Zero! It won't be that much work, it will just be every time you see one just change it to its full name, no problem. And it will avoid confusion to visitors who are very new to the Mario series. Zero signing out.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Not everyone knows what those abbreviations mean. It's always better to write it out the long way.
- LuigiMania (talk) Per LGM.
- Mechayoshi (talk) Per Zero
- Supershroom (talk) Abbreviations aren't their real names. It's like calling Luigi 'Weegee'. Mabye.
- WigglerWhoopin'Warrior135 (talk) Per Marioguy1 (In comments)
Keep Using Abbreviations
Comments
Full names in articles, abbreviations on talk pages. Marioguy1 (talk)
- We already have a rule on this. Full names go in articles. Fawfulfury65 (talk)
I won't be voting in this because my view is that something should only be shorted/abbrieviated if it's already been mentioned. Commander Code-8 (talk)
- M&SG (talk) - Abbreviations should only be used when the game's full name is shown BEFORE the abbreviation is used. That way, people won't get too confused.
The prefix "List of"
There are 166 lists on the wiki. 105 have the prefix "List of". The rest don't. We need concistency. Either we remove List of, or we add list of. I prefer removing it, because list of is unnecessary. While some of you might argue that people wouldn't know what is a list and what isn't, most of the articles that have list of are articles that people would expect to be lists.
Proposer: Reversinator (talk)
Voting start: October 1, 1:04 PM
Deadline: October 7, 23:59 GMT
Remove "List of" from all lists
- Reversinator (talk) Per me.