MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario Galaxy 2: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Oppose) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
@Fawfulfury65: I added that, because of my reasons listed here. It was there after it was put up for nomination. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | @Fawfulfury65: I added that, because of my reasons listed here. It was there after it was put up for nomination. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
LeftyGreenMario/New Super Mario: I disagree on adding the controls section they are not that important for the article as the gameplay and there not many of them on other game pages anyway. {{User|Lindsay151}} | |||
Revision as of 18:15, August 11, 2010
Super Mario Galaxy 2
Support
- Mario Fan 123 (talk) - It's a very good article, well written, great gameplay section, many images, good story, links... It's perfect, and I think it deserves to be a Featued Article.
- Toadwell (talk)
Oppose
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) First, my complaint with the story. The story section of the article doesn't really tell the story near the end of the section. It just shows "when the player does this" and switches back and forth from "the player" and "Mario" and it feels more like a gameplay and what gets unlocked section rather than a story. Second, the gameplay features section is a mess. Information is all over the place. An example of this is when it mentions hubs, then it goes immediately into the number of stars in the game. It also doesn't contain a list of powerups from this game, separately from the other items, much like Super Mario Galaxy does. I think that's about it.
- Baby Mario Bloops (talk) - Seriously, not ready yet. The images are very plentiful at the beginning, but the bottom half of the article is just image-less. Also, per all that BLOF said.
- New Super Mario (talk) Per BLOF
- Fawfulfury65 (talk) What's that blue template at the top of the page doing there?
- Fuzzipede27 (talk) - It has a rewritten template and it's not ready yet.
Removal of Opposes
Comments
The article may need a Controls/Gameplay section. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
Baby Mario Bloops: The bottom of the article is image-less because that part of the article is mostly composed of lists. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- So? We can add an image of the enemy at the top of the list. Just like the "New Enemies" section. But we can add an image of the E3 revealing. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
I think it also needs a Controls section. It could also use some more pictures... maybe just a little more. They are all jamed into the "Story" section. New Super Mario (talk)
@Fawfulfury65: I added that, because of my reasons listed here. It was there after it was put up for nomination. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
LeftyGreenMario/New Super Mario: I disagree on adding the controls section they are not that important for the article as the gameplay and there not many of them on other game pages anyway. Lindsay151 (talk)
