Talk:Super Strike: Difference between revisions
(→Oppose) |
Fawfulfury65 (talk | contribs) (→Oppose) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
#{{User|Superboo922}}Per all. I know right? Not that that's a bad thing. But if your proposals keep failing you could get banned. | #{{User|Superboo922}}Per all. I know right? Not that that's a bad thing. But if your proposals keep failing you could get banned. | ||
#{{User|Knife}} Per all except Superboo922. He has a right to create proposals, no matter stupid or pointless they are. | #{{User|Knife}} Per all except Superboo922. He has a right to create proposals, no matter stupid or pointless they are. | ||
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Per BPK. | |||
====Comment==== | ====Comment==== |
Revision as of 18:33, August 9, 2010
A lot of mergeing
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Monday, September 9, 2024, 07:30 GMT
I say we merge all the Super Strikes into the Super Strike article because all of the Super Strikes are stubs and what are the chances of them appearing in another game? And another reason is that all the Mega Strikes are in the Mega Strike article.
Proposer: Zero777 (talk)
Deadline: 6 August, 2010, 24:00
Support
- Zero777 (talk) I am Zero! Hey to avoid stubs and per proposal. Zero signing out.
- Ratfink43 (talk) All the megastrikes are merged into Mega Strike Right?
- Booderdash (talk) per ratfink, Mega strikes are almost exactly like Super strikes.
- Mario4Ever (talk) Per all.
Oppose
- BluePikminKong497 (talk) Zero, you know merging is not always the way to go for stubs?
- Tucayo (talk) - Per BPK. Merging is not a solution
- MrConcreteDonkey (talk) Per all. Isn't it strange how it is always the same couple of people voting to merge everything?
- Superboo922 (talk)Per all. I know right? Not that that's a bad thing. But if your proposals keep failing you could get banned.
- Knife (talk) Per all except Superboo922. He has a right to create proposals, no matter stupid or pointless they are.
- Fawfulfury65 (talk) Per BPK.
Comment
Thats ridiculous KS3. Why would we merge it into the CHARACTER article? Booderdash (talk)
- Because the Smash bros attacks are in the character articles too. KS3 (talk · contribute) 21:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Really I'm not sure to merge them in the characters' article - consider that merge SSB moves was a separated case. I still consider to keep them on their own.
¢oincoll€ctor
But nearly everything else hasn't (mario power tennis power shots, Superstar baseball shots etc.)
The characters megastrikes are all merged into the Mega Strike article, so why not do this to the Super Strikes? Ratfink43
- Then why don't you make a proposal to merge all the shots into their respective articles? KS3 (talk · contribute)
Into their respecive CHARCTER articles or their respecitve page articles ie all Power Shots into Power Shot?
- It's not merged. I was thinking about merging all Offensive Power Shots into the Offensive Power Shot article and merging all the Defensive Power Shots in the Defensive Power Shot article, etc. Or we merge all the Power Shots from Mario Power Tennis into one article. And why should we merge all the Power Shots in the character article? Wouldn't that make them harder to find and compare?
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 21:15, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- It's not merged. I was thinking about merging all Offensive Power Shots into the Offensive Power Shot article and merging all the Defensive Power Shots in the Defensive Power Shot article, etc. Or we merge all the Power Shots from Mario Power Tennis into one article. And why should we merge all the Power Shots in the character article? Wouldn't that make them harder to find and compare?