MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Sir Grodus: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Fawfulfury65 (talk | contribs) |
m (→Remove Featured Article Status: supported the removal of Featured article Sir Grodus.) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
#{{User|Booderdash}} Almost just as bad as the Shadow Queen article, with incorrect grammar, lack of images compared to the rather long and rambling descriptions, and Super Paper Mario section is WAY too short and can DEFINITLY be expanded... Some trivia also seems to be false but I'm not sure. | #{{User|Booderdash}} Almost just as bad as the Shadow Queen article, with incorrect grammar, lack of images compared to the rather long and rambling descriptions, and Super Paper Mario section is WAY too short and can DEFINITLY be expanded... Some trivia also seems to be false but I'm not sure. | ||
#{{User|KS3}} Per all. | #{{User|KS3}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|Blakzer}} It is pretty much what Booderdash said. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
Revision as of 12:37, July 27, 2010
Sir Grodus
Remove Featured Article Status
- Booderdash (talk) Almost just as bad as the Shadow Queen article, with incorrect grammar, lack of images compared to the rather long and rambling descriptions, and Super Paper Mario section is WAY too short and can DEFINITLY be expanded... Some trivia also seems to be false but I'm not sure.
- KS3 (talk) Per all.
- Blakzer (talk) It is pretty much what Booderdash said.
Keep Featured Article Status
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Comments
I think the number of images are just fine, TBH with you. But there's a tense tag, and I agree with that. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
- I'll go through and put it all in present tense soon, maybe tomorrow... Fawfulfury65 (talk)
