Talk:Unlockable: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Unlockable) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::I'd be fine with just deleting it. - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 16:13, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | :::I'd be fine with just deleting it. - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 16:13, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::Hmm... Well, it is terminology, and terminology has their articles, so I don't see why deleting it... --{{User:Tucayo/sig}} 16:20, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | ::::Hmm... Well, it is terminology, and terminology has their articles, so I don't see why deleting it... --{{User:Tucayo/sig}} 16:20, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::: {{User|Bowser's luma}} Still, should we do something about it (see me above) |
Revision as of 11:24, June 30, 2010
Unlockable
![]() |
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Do we really need articles about unofficially named terminology? --Marcelagus (T • C • E)
- Platitudinous (talk) I don't think so.
- Bowser's luma (talk) The only way this article is really necessary is if we add in a list of the unlockables in each game. That would be tedious but doable; I'd be glad to help.
- I'd be fine with just deleting it. -
Gabumon(talk) 16:13, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm... Well, it is terminology, and terminology has their articles, so I don't see why deleting it... --
™ The 'Shroom 16:20, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Bowser's luma (talk) Still, should we do something about it (see me above)
- Hmm... Well, it is terminology, and terminology has their articles, so I don't see why deleting it... --
- I'd be fine with just deleting it. -
- Bowser's luma (talk) The only way this article is really necessary is if we add in a list of the unlockables in each game. That would be tedious but doable; I'd be glad to help.