Talk:Kong: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Hmm... he looks like a hillbilly. Anyway, we should have a [[Beta Elements]] page just like on Mariowiki.--[[User:Knife|Knife, the guy who just asks questions, but does nothing on the wiki]] 23:22, 12 December 2006 (EST) | Hmm... he looks like a hillbilly. Anyway, we should have a [[Beta Elements]] page just like on Mariowiki.--[[User:Knife|Knife, the guy who just asks questions, but does nothing on the wiki]] 23:22, 12 December 2006 (EST) | ||
His name is Bumpkin kong from what I've heard and yes we should put him in the article. |
Revision as of 22:32, January 28, 2007
Should Manky Kongs be counted as a sub-species of kongs? Also what about other simians such as Minkeys, Ninjapes and the unamed White Monkeys of Donkey Kong: Jungle Beat? -- Sir Grodus
I've decided to just stick the Manky Kongs in the species category unless someone wants to oppose this. -- Sir Grodus
Well it depends if they have Kong in their name, then I consider them Kongs. Remember that not all monkeys/apes/orangutans are Kongs. (and personally I think Lanky Kong is a Kong)--Knife 23:53, 3 December 2006 (EST)
Still can't decide whether the Manky Kongs should be counted as a sub-species though. -- Sir Grodus
- I would consider Manky Kongs a sub-species. However, I would not consider any enemy without the "Kong" surname a sub-species. -- Son of Suns
New Kong
I've recently discovered that in Diddy Kong Pilot a new Kong was going to appear. Virtually nothing is known about this guy, not even his name. Do you think he should be mentioned in the article? -- Sir Grodus
- If the source is reliable then yes. -- Son of Suns
I have this picture of him, one of the few Diddy Kong pilot pics. I could find. Hes between Cranky and Donkey.
Hmm... he looks like a hillbilly. Anyway, we should have a Beta Elements page just like on Mariowiki.--Knife, the guy who just asks questions, but does nothing on the wiki 23:22, 12 December 2006 (EST)
His name is Bumpkin kong from what I've heard and yes we should put him in the article.