MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Yoshi: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{UNFANOMSTAT
|nominated=11:42, 7 March 2010 (EST)
|nominated=16:41, 7 March 2010 (GMT)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
}}
Line 8: Line 8:
#{{User|Reversinator}} First off, there's a rewrite-expand template. Second, how come half of the comic sub-sections are so short, and yet "Die Nacht der leuchtenden Yoshis!" is incredibly detailed? Third, IMAGES. I can not stress the fact that articles need images. Look at the middle of the article, and one can clearly see that images are nearly nowhere to be seen. And how come in [[Princess Peach#Golf installments|tons]] and [[Luigi#Mario Golf (series)|tons]] of [[Wario#Mario Golf series|articles]], the Mario Golf series section is extremely short? And finally, there's only three characters in the Relationships with Other Characters section. Really? That's all you guys can do?
#{{User|Reversinator}} First off, there's a rewrite-expand template. Second, how come half of the comic sub-sections are so short, and yet "Die Nacht der leuchtenden Yoshis!" is incredibly detailed? Third, IMAGES. I can not stress the fact that articles need images. Look at the middle of the article, and one can clearly see that images are nearly nowhere to be seen. And how come in [[Princess Peach#Golf installments|tons]] and [[Luigi#Mario Golf (series)|tons]] of [[Wario#Mario Golf series|articles]], the Mario Golf series section is extremely short? And finally, there's only three characters in the Relationships with Other Characters section. Really? That's all you guys can do?
#{{User|KS3}} Per all.
#{{User|KS3}} Per all.
#{{User|Time Q}}: Per Reversinator. Especially the comic sections really need work, and images.


==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
Line 16: Line 17:
#{{User|Reversinator}} I listed so many problems with the article, and you think it's fine without giving a reason?
#{{User|Reversinator}} I listed so many problems with the article, and you think it's fine without giving a reason?
#{{User|KS3}} First of all, it is not fun. Second of all, it is not fine. Notice to everyone: '''Stop opposing just because you like Yoshi.'''
#{{User|KS3}} First of all, it is not fun. Second of all, it is not fine. Notice to everyone: '''Stop opposing just because you like Yoshi.'''
#{{User|Time Q}}: (S)he doesn't even refer to Reversinator's points, so the vote is invalid.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
@KS3: Please specify your reason to remove LucariosAura's vote. Saying "it is not fine" is not enough. {{User|Time Q}}

Revision as of 12:05, March 7, 2010

Yoshi

Remove Featured Article Status

  1. Reversinator (talk) First off, there's a rewrite-expand template. Second, how come half of the comic sub-sections are so short, and yet "Die Nacht der leuchtenden Yoshis!" is incredibly detailed? Third, IMAGES. I can not stress the fact that articles need images. Look at the middle of the article, and one can clearly see that images are nearly nowhere to be seen. And how come in tons and tons of articles, the Mario Golf series section is extremely short? And finally, there's only three characters in the Relationships with Other Characters section. Really? That's all you guys can do?
  2. KS3 (talk) Per all.
  3. Time Q (talk): Per Reversinator. Especially the comic sections really need work, and images.

Keep Featured Article Status

  1. LucariosAura (used to be specialk) This article is full and fun, and is FINE! Keep as featured.

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

LucariosAura

  1. Reversinator (talk) I listed so many problems with the article, and you think it's fine without giving a reason?
  2. KS3 (talk) First of all, it is not fun. Second of all, it is not fine. Notice to everyone: Stop opposing just because you like Yoshi.
  3. Time Q (talk): (S)he doesn't even refer to Reversinator's points, so the vote is invalid.

Comments

@KS3: Please specify your reason to remove LucariosAura's vote. Saying "it is not fine" is not enough. Time Q (talk)