Talk:M: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
What about the portal Ms. Is that called something else or was it forgotten and not mentioned?{{user:theused/sig}}
What about the portal Ms. Is that called something else or was it forgotten and not mentioned?{{user:theused/sig}}


==Keep?==
==Merge M to Graffiti==
{{talk}}
{{TPP}}
Think about it: there's ton of different goops, all of which are just as important as eachother, and only this get to have an article? If one article gets to stay while other articles of the same genre are merged into one article, we should be consistent and merge this one to


Why an article on the "M" goop and not the rest? It's just as minor as the rest, so why not merge it? {{User:Reversinator/sig}}
'''Proposer:''' {{User|Reversinator}}<br>
'''Deadline:''' 23 February, 2010 17:00
 
===Support===
#{{User|Reversinator}} Per proposal.
 
===Oppose===
 
===Comments===

Revision as of 11:17, February 16, 2010

Official

Official name?...and should this be merged with goop? -- Son of Suns

"Goop" isn't an official name either. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 09:52, 14 September 2007 (EDT)
I know. So why have two conjecturally named articles when we could just have one about similar subjects? -- Son of Suns

F.L.U.D.D says M when refering to these, so its official. That and RAP let me create it. :O Full Metal MoogleKirbyWalk.gif

Hm?

What about the portal Ms. Is that called something else or was it forgotten and not mentioned?Δ ΔTheuseD.PNGΔ Δ

Merge M to Graffiti

Proposal.svg This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Friday, December 27, 2024, 02:50 GMT

Think about it: there's ton of different goops, all of which are just as important as eachother, and only this get to have an article? If one article gets to stay while other articles of the same genre are merged into one article, we should be consistent and merge this one to

Proposer: Reversinator (talk)
Deadline: 23 February, 2010 17:00

Support

  1. Reversinator (talk) Per proposal.

Oppose

Comments