Talk:Tentacle: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Comments) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
====Support==== | ====Support==== | ||
#{{User|Edofenrir}} - If I recall correctly the Blooper's tentacles in Paper Mario 2 don't even have a Tattle Log entry... | #{{User|Edofenrir}} - If I recall correctly the Blooper's tentacles in Paper Mario 2 don't even have a Tattle Log entry... | ||
#{{User|Reversinator}} Why not {{fakelink|Arm}}, {{fakelink|Leg}} or {{fakelink|Foot}}? Because it doesn't deserve an article. | #{{User|Reversinator}} Why not {{fakelink|Arm}}, {{fakelink|Leg}} or {{fakelink|Foot}}? Because it doesn't deserve an article. | ||
#{{User|Redstar}} - I'd considered proposing this myself, but went on for some reason. Glad to see it got support anyways. | |||
====Oppose==== | ====Oppose==== |
Revision as of 20:07, January 1, 2010
Merge Tentacle into Blooper
Tentacles are explicitly mentioned in this very article to be no more than the limbs of Bloopers, and the L. Tentacle and R. Tentacle links already redirect to the main Blooper article instead of this one. I really don't think a Blooper's arms deserve a seperate article just because the player may be able to target them in one game. Any usable information from this article should be merged into Blooper if not already mentioned there.
Proposer: vellidragon (talk)
Deadline: 15 January, 2010, 20:00
Support
- Edofenrir (talk) - If I recall correctly the Blooper's tentacles in Paper Mario 2 don't even have a Tattle Log entry...
- Reversinator (talk) Why not Template:Fakelink, Template:Fakelink or Template:Fakelink? Because it doesn't deserve an article.
- Redstar (talk) - I'd considered proposing this myself, but went on for some reason. Glad to see it got support anyways.
Oppose
Comments
What's IICR? Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- Should be IIRC, "If I remember correctly". Time Questions 12:06, 1 January 2010 (EST)