MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Fawfulfury65 (talk | contribs) (→Oppose) |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
#{{User|Super mario fan}} The story section has untrue or weird sections that aren't in the game. | #{{User|Super mario fan}} The story section has untrue or weird sections that aren't in the game. | ||
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - The non-gallery part of the article has ''two images'' | #{{User|Marioguy1}} - The non-gallery part of the article has ''two images'' | ||
#{{user|Fawfulfury65}} | #{{user|Fawfulfury65}} I've added more images, but there is an incomplete "Sidequests" section that must be complete for this to be a FA. | ||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== |
Revision as of 12:23, November 26, 2009
Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga
Support
- MATEOELBACAN (talk) This article it's much detailed,and has artwork this must be a FA.
- user:Super Luigi! i agree, because this is the first Mario & Luigi RPG game, and it it is a highly detailed article.
Oppose
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) This article needs more images especially in the story section. No one wants to read through text without images.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Per BabyLuigiOnFire. As I scroll down the page, I only see blocks of text with a few pictures to back it up.
- Baby Mario Bloops (talk) - I said to wait till there were images on the story part! Sorry, but images do count for featuring a article!
- Super mario fan (talk) The story section has untrue or weird sections that aren't in the game.
- Marioguy1 (talk) - The non-gallery part of the article has two images
- Fawfulfury65 (talk) I've added more images, but there is an incomplete "Sidequests" section that must be complete for this to be a FA.
Removal of Opposes
Comments
So you all say that the article lacks on images,huh?...Then I'll add them!--MATEOELBACAN 16:10, 13 November 2009 (EST)
I added some pics in the story section! Fawfulfury65 (talk)
Thanks ^^--MATEOELBACAN 18:07, 24 November 2009 (EST)