MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Koopa Bros.: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N/Koopa Bros. moved to MarioWiki:Featured Articles/A/Koopa Bros.: featured) |
m (featured) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
'''Koopa Bros. became a featured article at 19:24, 15 October 2009.''' | |||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Master Lucario}} The article is well-written, and contains pretty much all possible information about them. | #{{User|Master Lucario}} The article is well-written, and contains pretty much all possible information about them. | ||
Revision as of 06:56, October 17, 2009
Koopa Bros. became a featured article at 19:24, 15 October 2009.
Koopa Bros.
Support
- Master Lucario (talk) The article is well-written, and contains pretty much all possible information about them.
- Marioguy1 (talk) - Wow this article is good, it is extremely neat, contains sections on them, their appearances and each of the members. Also, there is exactly a proper amount of images. Not to many, not to few.
- McQueenMario (talk) - Looks great. I don't see anything wrong with it.
- SSF2Zelda (talk) - Here come the Koopa Bros.! To become a featured article. The article is great, make it the featured article.
- Gamefreak75 (talk) - That's a pretty long page for a one game appearance.
- Edofenrir (talk) - I read over it and it seems detailed, well written and overall very informative to me. I like the fact that it probably gives all the information available for them. I couldn't find anything to complain. This needs to be honoured with a support vote.
Oppose
Comments
Fawfulfury65: What exactly should be longer? Please be more specific. Time Q (talk)
- Well, if its long enough to fit the wiki standards than I guess you can remove my vote. So just forget about it. Fawfulfury65 (talk)
