MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgame$!: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 23: Line 23:


Other than that, I think a final spellcheck may be needed and I think it'll be ready.  -- [[User:MrsCrygor|MrsCrygor]] 14:30, 23 June 2009 (EDT)
Other than that, I think a final spellcheck may be needed and I think it'll be ready.  -- [[User:MrsCrygor|MrsCrygor]] 14:30, 23 June 2009 (EDT)
Okay.... This article is amazing, but.... there are WAY too many redlinks. I don't want to oppose over this, but there are way too many. I cant really make them, as I don't have this game. The featured article standards say "must have a reasonoble amount of redlinks" If anyone has this game, they should make some of the articles, but I also feel that some articles are unnesicary. {{User|luigifreak}}

Revision as of 10:20, July 1, 2009

WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgame$!

"WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgame$!" was nominated for featured article status at 15:13, 14 May 2009 (EDT). If the nomination does not pass by 19:13, 13 July 2009, it will be considered failed.

Support

  1. Grandy02 (talk): After a heavy expansion, I think the article is fine now. If there are any flaws (including grammar), please let me know.
  2. Arend (talk): This page includes everything you can tell about the game. It looks good. I like the part about the development.
  3. MrsCrygor 14:53, 23 June 2009 (EDT): As I've said below, this article is as informative about the game as it gets, I learned a lot more about it through this.

Oppose

Removal of Opposes

Comments

This page was last active on May 27. In a few days, it will be deleted, but even if just two people have voted (supported) so far? I think this has not been the case before. --Grandy02 13:52, 22 June 2009 (EDT)

Yeah, the rule says to delete an inactive nomination after 1 month, no matter how many people voted. But actually, you just pushed the deadline back one month by posting your comment. I don't know if this is allowed though... Time Questions 14:47, 22 June 2009 (EDT)
Thanks for answer. However, didn't post to push the deadline. Anyway, I don't know how an article can become featured when people just don't vote. --Grandy02 14:51, 22 June 2009 (EDT)
Yeah, it's a shame... it's probably because not many people played the game, and thusly can't tell if the article is FA-worthy. I think the best way to advertise your nomination would be to tell users on their talk pages about it. Time Questions 00:11, 23 June 2009 (EDT)

I had a good look at this article, and I'm impressed; it's as informative about the game, characters, development etc as you can get, and I'd like to see such improvements be applied to the articles about the other WarioWare games. I have one little problem though, and it's a browser thing more than anything - seems that Firefox users won't be able to see the Gold Digger picture [I tried it in Opera and IE and it works]. Although rare, I don't understand why FF does this in wikis. Nothing about the pic needs to be done though, just spilling a thought for FF users like myself. ^^;

Other than that, I think a final spellcheck may be needed and I think it'll be ready. -- MrsCrygor 14:30, 23 June 2009 (EDT)

Okay.... This article is amazing, but.... there are WAY too many redlinks. I don't want to oppose over this, but there are way too many. I cant really make them, as I don't have this game. The featured article standards say "must have a reasonoble amount of redlinks" If anyone has this game, they should make some of the articles, but I also feel that some articles are unnesicary. luigifreak (talk)

Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N1/WarioWare,_Inc.:_Mega_Microgame$!&oldid=587160"