|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{User:Glitchman/welcome}}
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Hello==
| |
| Would you consider reading [[MarioWiki:Proposals#New Way of Polling!|my proposal]]{{user:theused/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| I barely visit MiiWiki, so I don't think you saw me there. Maybe on Userpedia, though. But, hello, anyway. {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| I'm not the one who made that up, Wikipedia is. *runs away* {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| That was a joke, yo. :P {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| Oooooooo pretty welcome template. When I came to this wiki all I got was a guy to come and tell me to do better grammar. When did it get so elaborate? - [[User:Ultimatetoad|Ultimatetoad]]
| |
|
| |
| ==RE:Shroom==
| |
|
| |
| OK, Glitchman's is already doing it, but I guess an additional interviewer doesn't hurt. --[[User:Blitzwing|Blitzwing]] 18:41, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ==Sig==
| |
|
| |
| Ok, I uploaded a pic of rayquaza that I want in my sig. can you help?
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ==thanks==
| |
|
| |
| how do you get it to link to your user talk page? oh, and I am creating a new account and I would like to use that image. could you make another one? my other account's name is Darkfire_the_rayquaza
| |
|
| |
| == propose ==
| |
|
| |
| I agree on your proposal on the mario's last name thing so if there is any way i can help leave a comment on my talk page and i respond A.S.A.P.
| |
| SINCERLY,
| |
| Game freak
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Yeah, spoilers are evil. It would be funny if someone played the original Mario Bros and said "Hmm, what will the boss be?"
| |
|
| |
| That's like saying "Is The Pope Catholic?"
| |
|
| |
| {{User:Dom/sig|Wait...''is he?''}}
| |
|
| |
| ==Princess Peach FA Nomination==
| |
| Hi. You opposed the [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N/Princess Peach|FA nomination]] of [[Princess Peach]] for having too many ''Super Princess Peach'' images. Currently, there are only four images from this game in the gallery, so I think you should remove your vote too. Thanks! {{User:Time Q/sig}} 13:17, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| :Apparently yes I do have problems. {{User:Paper Jorge/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| ==Re:SMS Episodes==
| |
| But... what's the point? It's just a copy word for word, and even if we removed it from the level articles, it would just make them shorter. The descrpitions for the episodes are short enough, and I doubt we need an article designated to it. {{User:Garlic Man/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| ==Hi==
| |
| Hello Clay Mario, I am Mario3v how are you? {{user:Mario3v/sig}}
| |
| :Fine. And You? {{User|Clay Mario}}
| |
|
| |
| I am okay too thanks. {{User:Mario3v/sig}}
| |
|
| |
| ==RE: Articles==
| |
| Typically, a subject's notability is determined by two factors: 1) if there is an official name for the subject (i.e., an actual proper noun with capital letters, like "Goomba" or "Luigi," not say "sand"), and 2) the subject makes an actual appearance in the media it is referenced in (otherwise an officially named subject would be an [[:category:Implied|implied]] subject). Outside these criteria, it becomes difficult determining what and what should not have an article. The lists you were creating were basically listing of more lists, or other minor subjects. That's why we have categories - to generate lists of the articles the category is placed on. That would have worked better. List articles are usually created for MAJOR category subjects (like [[characters]]) or if the list is actually offering commentary on a notable subject (like [[King Koopa's alter egos]]).
| |
|
| |
| Hope that helps! -- {{User|Son of Suns}}
| |
