MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Doopliss: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Oppose) |
(→Oppose) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
# As White Knight said, the lead is only two sentences long, which is insufficient for a featured article. {{User:Pikax/sig}} | # As White Knight said, the lead is only two sentences long, which is insufficient for a featured article. {{User:Pikax/sig}} | ||
# Didn't Doopliss appear in ''[[Super Mario-Kun]]''? That should get a section here as well. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 10:51, 9 September 2008 (EDT) | |||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Well, one thing I noticed is that the introduction is only two sentences. FAs need good leads, so I say that the intro needs to be a paragraph at least. I didn't read the entire article, but does appear to be nice, detailed, and lengthy. {{User:White Knight/sig}} | Well, one thing I noticed is that the introduction is only two sentences. FAs need good leads, so I say that the intro needs to be a paragraph at least. I didn't read the entire article, but does appear to be nice, detailed, and lengthy. {{User:White Knight/sig}} | ||
Revision as of 09:51, September 9, 2008
Doopliss
Support
- I know I nominated him once long ago and he got taken off the list but his artical is waaaaaay better now it has more info more Images and is very well written thus why I say this artical should be featured. Luigibros2
Oppose
- As White Knight said, the lead is only two sentences long, which is insufficient for a featured article.
Pikax (talk) - Didn't Doopliss appear in Super Mario-Kun? That should get a section here as well. Stumpers! 10:51, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Comments
Well, one thing I noticed is that the introduction is only two sentences. FAs need good leads, so I say that the intro needs to be a paragraph at least. I didn't read the entire article, but does appear to be nice, detailed, and lengthy. WK
