User talk:SailorTrish08: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(I guess it'd be good to have the situation clarified, e.g. at least more explained.) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==The edit logistics thus far== | ==The edit logistics thus far== | ||
I've noticed you've only made three edits so far follow a fairly specific theme, and that the edit notes don't explain the edits very much. I can agree that [[Patissiere Sparkla]] is indisputably female, but the reverting for [[Kung Fu Sparkla]] in particular, especially without adding any edit note for the revert, seems a bit strict in my eyes. I unfortunately also think that "No" is not a proper edit note. [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 04:06, April 23, 2024 (EDT) | I've noticed you've only made three edits so far, which follow a fairly specific theme, and that the edit notes don't explain the edits very much. I can agree that [[Patissiere Sparkla]] is indisputably female, but the reverting for [[Kung Fu Sparkla]] in particular, especially without adding any edit note for the revert, seems a bit strict in my eyes. I unfortunately also think that "No" is not a proper edit note. [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 04:06, April 23, 2024 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:06, April 23, 2024
The edit logistics thus far
I've noticed you've only made three edits so far, which follow a fairly specific theme, and that the edit notes don't explain the edits very much. I can agree that Patissiere Sparkla is indisputably female, but the reverting for Kung Fu Sparkla in particular, especially without adding any edit note for the revert, seems a bit strict in my eyes. I unfortunately also think that "No" is not a proper edit note. DandelionSprout (talk) 04:06, April 23, 2024 (EDT)
