Talk:Water Arena: Difference between revisions
Dr. Hammer (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
(Any oppose?) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Although these articles are almost pointless, considering both this and the Sand arena are completely featureless circular arenas, they ARE still arenas. But the thing is... it doesn't have a name. [[User:Dr. Hammer|Dr. Hammer]] 03:42, 14 June 2008 (EDT) | Although these articles are almost pointless, considering both this and the Sand arena are completely featureless circular arenas, they ARE still arenas. But the thing is... it doesn't have a name. [[User:Dr. Hammer|Dr. Hammer]] 03:42, 14 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Indeed, that's the point. Does anyone oppose the deletion of the other two articles? {{User:Time Q/sig}} 08:50, 14 June 2008 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 07:50, June 14, 2008
... Isn't that a bit too minor to have an article? It's only a platform surrounded by Water, we might just as well makes an article on things like the Chain Chomp Gate or the Ice Platform. --Blitzwing 06:51, 12 June 2008 (EDT)
I vote for deletion. This is just... Stupid. My Bloody Valentine
If it isn't officially named: delete it. If it is officially named: I don't know... Time Questions 09:36, 12 June 2008 (EDT)
What about Sand Arena and Lava Arena? Delete them too? Time Questions 11:57, 12 June 2008 (EDT)
I say yes. My Bloody Valentine
Although these articles are almost pointless, considering both this and the Sand arena are completely featureless circular arenas, they ARE still arenas. But the thing is... it doesn't have a name. Dr. Hammer 03:42, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
