MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Kart (series): Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Bloc Partier (talk | contribs) (Hmm... Since when do we use {{user}} here?) |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:It's probably stupid, but I thought it was interesting that they were the only characters classified as the same weight in every game. {{User|Stooben Rooben}} 18:51, 1 June 2008 (EDT) | :It's probably stupid, but I thought it was interesting that they were the only characters classified as the same weight in every game. {{User|Stooben Rooben}} 18:51, 1 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
::Oh, I see what you meant. I thought it was saying that they were all middleweights. :P {{User|InfectedShroom}} | ::Oh, I see what you meant. I thought it was saying that they were all middleweights. :P {{User|InfectedShroom}} | ||
:::Oh, I should probably reword it then. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 23:59, 2 June 2008 (EDT) |
Revision as of 22:59, June 2, 2008
Mario Kart (series)
Support
- Garlic Man (talk) - Very organized, plenty of imformation, overall excellent
- Super-Yoshi (talk) - Includes major information on series, and this article has improved by over 5 KB. A must for FA.
- Stooben Rooben (talk) The article has expanded greatly in the past 3 days; I find it consisting of all the adequate information and imagery to be a featured article. 20:50, 30 May 2008 (EDT)
- Coincollector (talk) it's a great (I mean, shows a plenty of good info) article. it can require some minor edits, but that's like a piece of cake.
- Clay Mario (talk) It is written well and carries a lot of information and detail
- Pikax (talk) Per everyone.
Oppose
Comments
Er... Wut's with that last trivia? Is there something obvious I'm missing? :/ Great article, BTW. InfectedShroom (talk)
- It's probably stupid, but I thought it was interesting that they were the only characters classified as the same weight in every game. Stooben Rooben (talk) 18:51, 1 June 2008 (EDT)