MarioWiki talk:BJAODN: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Er, [[MarioWiki:BJAODN#Koopaling]] isn't an error. Look up "intercourse".{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} 13:56, 28 March 2008 (EDT) | Er, [[MarioWiki:BJAODN#Koopaling]] isn't an error. Look up "intercourse".{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} 13:56, 28 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Indeed. No typo, a badly chosen term at the most. I removed it. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 14:10, 28 March 2008 (EDT) | :Indeed. No typo, a badly chosen term at the most. I removed it. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 14:10, 28 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
::I reverted your edits. Yes, it's a badly choosen word - That's even the whole freakin' point! While it is technically coorect, you can't deny it sound odd considering the context. --[[User:Blitzwing|Blitzwing]] 15:10, 28 March 2008 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:10, March 28, 2008
They say that nothing is perfect, but this certainly is a strong contender. 
20:33, 22 March 2008 (EDT)
- Is there any rule for sorting this? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 14:35, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
- No. --Blitzwing 14:40, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
- We should add the World 2-1 (NSMB)-article. It's simply "world 2-1". ;) --PaperStriker 16:06, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
- Wouldn't alphabetical sorting do the job? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 18:43, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
- Yep, but I'm too lazy to alphabetize the whole thing. --Blitzwing 18:52, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
- No. --Blitzwing 14:40, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
Er, MarioWiki:BJAODN#Koopaling isn't an error. Look up "intercourse".Greenpickle 13:56, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
- Indeed. No typo, a badly chosen term at the most. I removed it. Time Questions 14:10, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
- I reverted your edits. Yes, it's a badly choosen word - That's even the whole freakin' point! While it is technically coorect, you can't deny it sound odd considering the context. --Blitzwing 15:10, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
