MarioWiki:Appeals/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "Appeals/Archive Template" to "Appeals/Archive/Template") |
m (Text replacement - "AppealOutcome" to "appeal outcome") |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
===BabyLuigiOnFire=== | ===BabyLuigiOnFire=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|reminder|overturned|Users get a week to fix their sigs before any punitive action is taken after the initial {{tem|Sigfix}} is administered.}} | ||
*[[User talk:BabyLuigiOnFire#Reminder]] | *[[User talk:BabyLuigiOnFire#Reminder]] | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
===Mario7=== | ===Mario7=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|last warning|amended|Reverting admin edits is not actually breaking rules in and of itself, however this user had been repeatedly spoken to about making edits like the one in question, and has been issued a regular Warning for that in place of the Last Warning.}} | ||
*[[User_talk:Mario7#Last_Warning]] | *[[User_talk:Mario7#Last_Warning]] | ||
====[[User:Mario7|Mario7]]==== | ====[[User:Mario7|Mario7]]==== | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
===The Chain Chomp=== | ===The Chain Chomp=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|warning|stands|Antagonizing other users is not allowed, and being new is no excuse: the fact that you shouldn't be rude should be a given (besides, even after the initial warning, the user continued being confrontational and had to be warned again).}} | ||
*[[User_talk:The_Chain_Chomp#Warning]] | *[[User_talk:The_Chain_Chomp#Warning]] | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
===Baby Luigi=== | ===Baby Luigi=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|warning|overturned|Censored swears in edit summaries aren't against rules as long as the implied swearing isn't ''at'' someone else. If the other user had a problem with it, they should have sent an informal message, rather than jumping straight to a Warning.}} | ||
*[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Baby_Luigi&diff=1608028&oldid=1607532 My warning] | *[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Baby_Luigi&diff=1608028&oldid=1607532 My warning] | ||
====Baby Luigi==== | ====Baby Luigi==== | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
===Mario=== | ===Mario=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|warning|overturned|This warning makes no sense. An informal message and actually specifying what's the matter would have been better.}} | ||
*[[User talk:Mario#Warning|Mario's warning]] | *[[User talk:Mario#Warning|Mario's warning]] | ||
====Mario==== | ====Mario==== | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
===Pinkie Pie=== | ===Pinkie Pie=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|reminder|mootpoint|The user was blocked, so it's a moot point now.}} | ||
*[[User talk:Pinkie Pie/Archive 6#Reminder 2]] | *[[User talk:Pinkie Pie/Archive 6#Reminder 2]] | ||
====Pinkie Pie==== | ====Pinkie Pie==== | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
===Viper26=== | ===Viper26=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|reminder|overturned|The user complied with the message before removing it, and they were likely unaware of the rule against removing legit comments. An informal reminder would've been better, since this was their first offense, and it wasn't done with malicious intent.}} | ||
*[[User talk:Viper26#Reminder]] | *[[User talk:Viper26#Reminder]] | ||
====Viper26==== | ====Viper26==== | ||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
===[[User:BossBass|BossBass]]=== | ===[[User:BossBass|BossBass]]=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|warning|overturned|This seemed to be a legitimate copy-paste accident on the user's part, since the spam was just part of another article's text. However, it's still important to use the preview button before editing to avoid things like this in the future.}} | ||
*[[User talk:BossBass#Warning]] | *[[User talk:BossBass#Warning]] | ||
====[[User:BossBass|BossBass]]==== | ====[[User:BossBass|BossBass]]==== | ||
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
===TrickyMario7654=== | ===TrickyMario7654=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|last warning|mootpoint|All points made in the warning were valid, and the user's actions couldn't just be overturned. The user was also tempblocked, so it's a moot point now.}} | ||
*[[User talk:TrickyMario7654#Last Warning|Last Warning]] | *[[User talk:TrickyMario7654#Last Warning|Last Warning]] | ||
====TrickyMario7654==== | ====TrickyMario7654==== | ||
Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
===Pwwnd123=== | ===Pwwnd123=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|warning|stands|The user was repeatedly told to stop but kept doing it anyway, and went as far as insulting other people over it, both directly and in an edit summary. Behavior like this is completely unacceptable, and the warning stands.}} | ||
*[[User_talk:Pwwnd123/Archive 1#Warning|Warning]] | *[[User_talk:Pwwnd123/Archive 1#Warning|Warning]] | ||
====Pwwnd123==== | ====Pwwnd123==== | ||
Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
===Mario=== | ===Mario=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|reminder|overturned|The swearing wasn't malicious or directed towards anyone, and while it wasn't a good idea, a Reminder was an overreaction.}} | ||
*[http://www.mariowiki.com/User_talk:Mario#Whoa Reminder for swearing in edit summaries] | *[http://www.mariowiki.com/User_talk:Mario#Whoa Reminder for swearing in edit summaries] | ||
====Mario==== | ====Mario==== | ||
Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
===[[User:Baby Luigi|Baby Luigi]]=== | ===[[User:Baby Luigi|Baby Luigi]]=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|warning|overturned|Both users were at fault for edit warring, but Mario7's edits were in the wrong and Baby Luigi tried to explain as much with the edit summaries, and she certainly wasn't creating "obvious hoaxes".}} | ||
*http://www.mariowiki.com/User_talk:Baby_Luigi#Warning | *http://www.mariowiki.com/User_talk:Baby_Luigi#Warning | ||
Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
===[[User:Pwwnd123|Pwwnd123]]=== | ===[[User:Pwwnd123|Pwwnd123]]=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|reminder|overturned|The swearing wasn't malicious or directed towards anyone, and while it wasn't a good idea, a Reminder was an overreaction.}} | ||
*http://www.mariowiki.com/User_talk:Pwwnd123#Reminder | *http://www.mariowiki.com/User_talk:Pwwnd123#Reminder | ||
====Pwwnd123==== | ====Pwwnd123==== | ||
Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
===Randombob-omb4761=== | ===Randombob-omb4761=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|reminder|overturned|Very unnecessary.}} | ||
*[[User talk:Randombob-omb4761#I think you should get this...]] | *[[User talk:Randombob-omb4761#I think you should get this...]] | ||
Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
===Stonehill=== | ===Stonehill=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|reminder|overturned|It wasn't obvious that Viper26 was in the middle of an editing project, and even if it was, first-time Courtesy offences should be dealt with informally: Reminders are for major breaches or repeat offences.}} | ||
*[[User talk:Stonehill#Reminder]] | *[[User talk:Stonehill#Reminder]] | ||
====Stonehill==== | ====Stonehill==== | ||
Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
===Bazooka Mario=== | ===Bazooka Mario=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|warning|overturned|Reverting undeniably bad edits repeatedly isn't edit warring, it's quality control, especially when you do contact the other editor via talk page: if they refuse to listen, they're the one warring, and the only one deserving of a Warning.}} | ||
*[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Bazooka_Mario&diff=1893191&oldid=1892785 Warning] | *[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Bazooka_Mario&diff=1893191&oldid=1892785 Warning] | ||
====Bazooka Mario==== | ====Bazooka Mario==== | ||
Line 183: | Line 183: | ||
===Tailikku1=== | ===Tailikku1=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|warning|overturned|Tailikku1's translations were perfectly fine for the most part: this is just another example of Goolgenerade being unnecessarily caustic towards him.}} | ||
http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATailikku1&diff=1894701&oldid=1891154 | http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATailikku1&diff=1894701&oldid=1891154 | ||
====Tailikku1==== | ====Tailikku1==== | ||
Line 193: | Line 193: | ||
==={{User|Roy Koopa}}=== | ==={{User|Roy Koopa}}=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|warning|overturned|Telling someone they're breaking rules is not vandalizing their talk page in any way: this warning was a hugely inappropriate overreaction.}} | ||
*[[User talk:Roy Koopa#Warning !!|Here it is.]] | *[[User talk:Roy Koopa#Warning !!|Here it is.]] | ||
====Roy Koopa==== | ====Roy Koopa==== | ||
Line 203: | Line 203: | ||
==={{User|Fawful's Minion}}=== | ==={{User|Fawful's Minion}}=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|warning|stands|Although posting on talk pages of inactive users is not explicitly disallowed according to the policy pages, you did {{plain link|1=[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Poop&diff=prev&oldid=1996491 ignore advice]}} from other users to not continue conversations which are outdated or no longer valid. Your comments were reverted for this reason, and because they added no constructive input to the page. Less than a week later, yet again you {{plain link|1=[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Epic_Rosalina&diff=prev&oldid=1998101 replied to old comments]}} after other users had told you not to. Coupled with the fact that you have accumulated a large amount of other Reminders and Warnings before this one, the Warning you are appealing will stand.}} | ||
*[[User talk:Fawful's Minion/Archive 2#Warning]] | *[[User talk:Fawful's Minion/Archive 2#Warning]] | ||
Line 215: | Line 215: | ||
==={{user|LuigiBro}}=== | ==={{user|LuigiBro}}=== | ||
{{ | {{appeal outcome|warning|overturned|Asides from the fact that reverting an edit once does not count as edit warring, the user was experiencing an issue with the new version of the image. They should have simply been informed to clear their browser cache to view the image correctly: there was no warrant for a last warning.}} | ||
*[[User talk:LuigiBro#Last Warning]] | *[[User talk:LuigiBro#Last Warning]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:08, May 31, 2024
BabyLuigiOnFirereminder overturned BabyLuigiOnFire
The Zombie Bros.
Mario7last warning amended Mario7
Pinkie Pie
The Chain Chompwarning stands The Chain Chomp
KP
Baby Luigiwarning overturned Baby Luigi
ParaLemmy1234
Mariowarning overturned Mario
ParaLemmy1234
Pinkie Piereminder stands Pinkie Pie
TrickyMario7654
Viper26reminder overturned Viper26KP posted a reminder about removing a talk page post that is about removing a section I deleted after seeing the post. KP re did the talk page post about removing a section on the user page and gave a reminder. Epic Rosalina thinks the reminder is too weak and should be given if I did this multiple times. He thinks I should go here and report the case. KPRemoving other users comments falls in the level two offenses in the Warning Policy, as does undermining admin authority, which he did by undoing Turboo's edit. I gave him a reminder for this and I think it is issued fairly. Also, Epic Rosalina is not all-knowing, and you should really give a reason yourself when appealing. CommentsYeah that's right. The reminder was issued fairly, but I followed Epic Rosalina's decision. - Viper26 (talk) BossBasswarning overturned BossBass
Epic Rosalina
TrickyMario7654last warning stands TrickyMario7654
Time Turner
Pwwnd123warning stands Pwwnd123
Time Turner
Marioreminder overturned Mario
Epic Rosalina
Baby Luigiwarning overturned Baby Luigi
Mario7
Pwwnd123reminder overturned Pwwnd123
Stonehill
Randombob-omb4761reminder overturned Randombob-omb4761
Joseph
Stonehillreminder overturned Stonehill
Viper26
Bazooka Mariowarning overturned Bazooka Mario
Joey2871
Tailikku1warning overturned http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATailikku1&diff=1894701&oldid=1891154 Tailikku1
Goolgenerade[NO COMMENT] Roy Koopa (talk)warning overturned Roy Koopa
MarioMario456
Fawful's Minion (talk)warning stands Fawful's Minion
Baby Luigi
LuigiBro (talk)warning overturned LuigiBro
WildgoosespeederI looked at this user's history before issuing and he had a history of edit warring. He uploaded a low-res version of File:MPAdvanceUKboxart.jpg (first version) and I uploaded something better (second version). He reverted it because it wouldn't load on his userpage properly. I put back the higher quality version and suggested to him to clear his browser cache. After the reversions, I did notice something fishy with the thumbnail on his userpage. Instead of reverting the image, I used action=purge in the URL (image, gallery, and user page). On my end, that might have done the trick. |