MarioWiki talk:Mushroom World Encyclopedia: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Tag: Mobile edit
(→‎Expand it: new section)
Tag: Mobile edit
Line 8: Line 8:


Don't Remove it [[User:Super Mario Bros. Wiki|Super Mario Bros. Wiki]] ([[User talk:Super Mario Bros. Wiki|talk]]) 16:43, May 13, 2020 (EDT)
Don't Remove it [[User:Super Mario Bros. Wiki|Super Mario Bros. Wiki]] ([[User talk:Super Mario Bros. Wiki|talk]]) 16:43, May 13, 2020 (EDT)
== Expand it ==
Expand it [[User:Super Mario Bros. Wiki|Super Mario Bros. Wiki]] ([[User talk:Super Mario Bros. Wiki|talk]]) 16:45, May 13, 2020 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:45, May 13, 2020

Inactivity

Question.svg This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

I think "mariowiki.net" should be marked as (inactive) because of it's inactivity, and small amount of Inactivity. It could be useful for users who click on it. 46.85.79.44 12:36, 6 December 2017 (EST)

Doesn't matter if a site is inactive or not as long as it is still up and has the info we're looking for. As a wiki, it could become active at any moment, so it would probably be pointless to mark it. For example, we don't mark WarsWiki for being inactive despite it being locked. Alex95sig1.pngAlex95sig2.png 12:38, 6 December 2017 (EST)
(There is a problem with talking here. This is my second try.) I contacted the one editor "MeincraftManu" which is an admin of it, which seems unresponsible, because he is not answering on the forum, they marked on the wiki. There is an window who tells you how long he took to read (Amount of time: 8 minutes). Also, the other Wiki I've found, of the wikia site, has a lot more sites, better edits, while this wiki tho has wrong informations, crappy edits, and Templates that are broke making the user to feel not to read it. 46.85.79.44 12:46, 6 December 2017 (EST)
Doesn't matter. The site is still part of the Mushroom World Encyclopedia project, and we shouldn't remove it without discussion with them first. And we aren't affiliated with wikia. Alex95sig1.pngAlex95sig2.png 12:49, 6 December 2017 (EST)
As I already said, the one last adminstrator seems to be unresponsible. He/She won't answer me, after two tries. The questions where neutral, so there is no reason why he/she shouldn't. I understand, that this site will not promote Wikia (because they got an English site too, but the texts are stolen!, but not the german one which makes it all weird.), but I just want to have an clear result of why mariowiki.net should be linked to with these Things.
The preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.85.79.44 (talk).

Don't Remove it Super Mario Bros. Wiki (talk) 16:43, May 13, 2020 (EDT)

Expand it

Expand it Super Mario Bros. Wiki (talk) 16:45, May 13, 2020 (EDT)