Template talk:Wp: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Waluigi Time (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:It's slightly less bytes and a bit more intuitive to use in comparison to interwiki links, though there's nothing necessarily implying that interwiki linking is "broken" or that this template is designed to "fix" anything to begin with. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 10:26, October 27, 2019 (EDT) | :It's slightly less bytes and a bit more intuitive to use in comparison to interwiki links, though there's nothing necessarily implying that interwiki linking is "broken" or that this template is designed to "fix" anything to begin with. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 10:26, October 27, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::Considering that this template is already used on thousands of pages, and there's no visual or functional difference between using this or interwiki links, I see no harm to just leave it as is and let the editor pick which way they want to use. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 13:12, October 27, 2019 (EDT) |
Revision as of 12:12, October 27, 2019
Request
Will you please change <noinclude>[[Category:Formatting templates]]</noinclude>
to <noinclude>[[Category:Link templates]]</noinclude>
? Woodchuck
Necessary?
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
This template is redundant to the interwiki table links (which work perfectly fine and display exactly the same as this). Is it really necessary to have two ways to link to Wikipedia? TheDarkStar 12:04, October 26, 2019 (EDT)
- It's slightly less bytes and a bit more intuitive to use in comparison to interwiki links, though there's nothing necessarily implying that interwiki linking is "broken" or that this template is designed to "fix" anything to begin with. -- Lord G. matters. 10:26, October 27, 2019 (EDT)
- Considering that this template is already used on thousands of pages, and there's no visual or functional difference between using this or interwiki links, I see no harm to just leave it as is and let the editor pick which way they want to use. -- Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 13:12, October 27, 2019 (EDT)