Talk:Green Toad (Mario Party 9): Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
TheDarkStar (talk | contribs) |
SmokedChili (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} I think the other proposal made it clear enough. | #{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} I think the other proposal made it clear enough. | ||
#{{User|TheDarkStar}} - Per all. | #{{User|TheDarkStar}} - Per all. | ||
#{{User|SmokedChili}} Per all. | |||
====Oppose==== | ====Oppose==== |
Revision as of 17:52, July 16, 2019
Delete this page
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Sunday, September 8, 2024, 11:47 GMT
Since the proposal to stop considering the NSMBWii Toads the same as the ones in Mario Party passed, and it was agreed to remove the information outright rather than splitting them off, I'm proposing to delete Green Toad for consistency. He's a conjecturally named character who only pops up once each board to explain an event, and never returns after Mario Party 9. I really don't see the point in keeping this.
Proposer: Waluigi Time (talk)
Deadline: July 30, 2019, 23:59 GMT
Support
- Waluigi Time (talk) Per proposal.
- FanOfYoshi (talk) It should be merged regardless, as it kinda worths mentionning on Toad (species) as well.
- Doomhiker (talk) He is a generic Green Toad with no significance. He really should have been on the Toad species article to start with, so I fully agree with merging this page.
- Toadette the Achiever (talk) I think the other proposal made it clear enough.
- TheDarkStar (talk) - Per all.
- SmokedChili (talk) Per all.
Oppose
Comments
So, if i understand, it's a counterproposal to the splitting one? -- FanOfYoshi 14:27, July 16, 2019 (EDT)