Talk:Enemy Battles: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} Per proposal.
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} Per proposal.
#{{User|FanOfYoshi}} Everything merged here makes it tenuous. Per proposal.
#{{User|FanOfYoshi}} Everything merged here makes it tenuous. Per proposal.
#{{User|Waluigi Time}} On one hand, all of these would be very short articles, but that's not necessarily bad if there's nothing else to say. On the other hand, this article is extremely clunky as is and tacked together, and I think they would be better off on their own pages.


===Oppose===
===Oppose===


===Comments===
===Comments===

Revision as of 13:12, February 23, 2019

Split everything out of this page?

Question.svg This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

Should we split all of the levels from this page, since we already have levels like A Banquet with Hisstocrat and Motley Bossblob's Big Battle split out despite their incredibly short length? Toadette icon CTTT.pngFont of Archivist Toadette's signature(T|C) 00:49, 15 January 2019 (EST)

Split everything out of this page

Proposal.svg This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Sunday, December 1, 2024, 11:25 GMT

See comment above. I don't know why the levels here are all merged to begin with, but I think we should split all of the levels on this page into their own respective articles for consistency sake. What happens to this page next (whether it gets deleted or whatnot) has no bearing on this proposal.

Proposer: Toadette the Achiever (talk)
Deadline: February 22, 2018, 23:59 GMT

Support

  1. Toadette the Achiever (talk) Per proposal.
  2. FanOfYoshi (talk) Everything merged here makes it tenuous. Per proposal.
  3. Waluigi Time (talk) On one hand, all of these would be very short articles, but that's not necessarily bad if there's nothing else to say. On the other hand, this article is extremely clunky as is and tacked together, and I think they would be better off on their own pages.

Oppose

Comments